Suppr超能文献

泊马度胺联合低剂量地塞米松与高剂量地塞米松单独用于治疗复发和难治性多发性骨髓瘤(MM-003)患者:一项随机、开放标签、3 期试验。

Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone alone for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM-003): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Hospital e Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Universidad de Salamanca (IBMCC/CSIC), Salamanca, Spain; Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1055-1066. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70380-2. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few effective treatments exist for patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma not responding to treatment with bortezomib and lenalidomide. Pomalidomide alone has shown limited efficacy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, but synergistic effects have been noted when combined with dexamethasone. We compared the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone with high-dose dexamethasone alone in these patients.

METHODS

This multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial was undertaken in Australia, Canada, Europe, Russia, and the USA. Patients were eligible if they had been diagnosed with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, and had failed at least two previous treatments of bortezomib and lenalidomide. They were assigned in a 2:1 ratio with a validated interactive voice and internet response system to either 28 day cycles of pomalidomide (4 mg/day on days 1-21, orally) plus low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, orally) or high-dose dexamethasone (40 mg/day on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20, orally) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors were age (≤75 years vs >75 years), disease population (refractory vs relapsed and refractory vs bortezomib intolerant), and number of previous treatments (two vs more than two). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01311687, and with EudraCT, number 2010-019820-30.

FINDINGS

The accrual for the study has been completed and the analyses are presented. 302 patients were randomly assigned to receive pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone and 153 high-dose dexamethasone. After a median follow-up of 10·0 months (IQR 7·2-13·2), median PFS with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone was 4·0 months (95% CI 3·6-4·7) versus 1·9 months (1·9-2·2) with high-dose dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0·48 [95% CI 0·39-0·60]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 haematological adverse events in the pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone and high-dose dexamethasone groups were neutropenia (143 [48%] of 300 vs 24 [16%] of 150, respectively), anaemia (99 [33%] vs 55 [37%], respectively), and thrombocytopenia (67 [22%] vs 39 [26%], respectively). Grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events in the pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone and high-dose dexamethasone groups included pneumonia (38 [13%] vs 12 [8%], respectively), bone pain (21 [7%] vs seven [5%], respectively), and fatigue (16 [5%] vs nine [6%], respectively). There were 11 (4%) treatment-related adverse events leading to death in the pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone group and seven (5%) in the high-dose dexamethasone group.

INTERPRETATION

Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone, an oral regimen, could be considered a new treatment option in patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

FUNDING

Celgene Corporation.

摘要

背景

对于接受硼替佐米和来那度胺治疗后无反应的难治性或复发性难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者,目前尚无有效的治疗方法。单独使用来那度胺治疗复发性多发性骨髓瘤的疗效有限,但与地塞米松联合使用时可产生协同作用。我们比较了泊马度胺联合低剂量地塞米松与高剂量地塞米松单独治疗这些患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项在澳大利亚、加拿大、欧洲、俄罗斯和美国进行的多中心、开放性、随机 3 期试验。符合条件的患者诊断为难治性或复发性难治性多发性骨髓瘤,并且至少接受过两种硼替佐米和来那度胺的治疗。他们通过经过验证的交互式语音和互联网响应系统以 2:1 的比例随机分配至 28 天周期的泊马度胺(第 1-21 天每天 4mg,口服)加低剂量地塞米松(第 1、8、15 和 22 天每天 40mg,口服)或高剂量地塞米松(第 1-4、9-12 和 17-20 天每天 40mg,口服)治疗,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性。分层因素为年龄(≤75 岁与>75 岁)、疾病人群(难治性与复发性难治性与硼替佐米不耐受)和治疗次数(两次与两次以上)。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。分析采用意向治疗。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01311687,并在 EudraCT 注册,编号为 2010-019820-30。

结果

该研究的入组已完成,现报告分析结果。302 例患者被随机分配接受泊马度胺联合低剂量地塞米松和高剂量地塞米松治疗。中位随访 10.0 个月(IQR 7.2-13.2)后,泊马度胺联合低剂量地塞米松组的中位 PFS 为 4.0 个月(95%CI 3.6-4.7),而高剂量地塞米松组为 1.9 个月(1.9-2.2)(风险比 0.48 [95%CI 0.39-0.60];p<0.0001)。泊马度胺联合低剂量地塞米松组和高剂量地塞米松组最常见的 3-4 级血液学不良事件分别为中性粒细胞减少症(300 例中的 143 例[48%]与 150 例中的 24 例[16%])、贫血(33%与 37%)和血小板减少症(22%与 26%)。泊马度胺联合低剂量地塞米松组和高剂量地塞米松组的 3-4 级非血液学不良事件分别为肺炎(13%与 8%)、骨痛(7%与 5%)和疲劳(5%与 6%)。泊马度胺联合低剂量地塞米松组有 11 例(4%)治疗相关不良事件导致死亡,高剂量地塞米松组有 7 例(5%)。

结论

泊马度胺联合低剂量地塞米松(一种口服方案)可能成为难治性或复发性难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的新治疗选择。

资金来源

Celgene 公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验