Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Lancet Haematol. 2023 Oct;10(10):e813-e824. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00218-1.
The primary analysis of the APOLLO trial, done after a median follow-up of 16·9 months, showed that daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone significantly improved progression-free survival versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone. Here, we report the final overall survival and updated safety results from APOLLO.
APOLLO was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 48 academic centres and hospitals across 12 countries in Europe, that included adults aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had an ECOG performance status score of 0-2, had received at least one previous line of therapy, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor, had a partial response or better to one or more previous lines of antimyeloma therapy, and were refractory to lenalidomide if they had received only one previous line of therapy. An interactive web-response system was used to randomly assign patients (1:1) to receive daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone or pomalidomide and dexamethasone; patients were stratified by the number of previous lines of therapy and International Staging System disease stage. Oral pomalidomide (4 mg once daily; days 1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg once daily; days 1, 8, 15, and 22) were given in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Daratumumab (1800 mg subcutaneously or 16 mg/kg intravenously) was administered weekly (cycles 1-2), every 2 weeks (cycles 3-6), and every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival, which has previously been reported, and the pre-planned secondary endpoint of overall survival were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03180736) and is no longer enrolling patients.
Between June 22, 2017, and June 13, 2019, 304 patients were randomly assigned: 151 to the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group and 153 to the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group. The median age was 67 years (IQR 60-72); 143 (47%) patients were female and 161 (53%) were male, and 272 (89%) were White. At a median follow-up of 39·6 months (IQR 37·1-43·7), median overall survival was 34·4 months (95% CI 23·7-40·3) in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group versus 23·7 months (19·6-29·4) in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·82 [95% CI 0·61-1·11]; p=0·20). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (103 [69%] of 149 with daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone vs 76 [51%] of 150 with pomalidomide and dexamethasone), anaemia (27 [18%] vs 32 [21%]), and thrombocytopenia (27 [18%] vs 28 [19%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 80 (54%) of 149 patients in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group and in 60 (40%) of 150 patients in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group, the most common of which was pneumonia (23 [15%] of 149 vs 13 [9%] of 150). Treatment-emergent adverse events resulting in death occurred in 13 (9%) of 149 patients in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group and in 13 (9%) of 150 patients in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group, with 4 (3%) of 151 adverse events leading to death within 30 days of the last treatment dose thought to be related to study treatment in the daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (septic shock [n=1]; sepsis [n=1]; bone marrow failure, campylobacter infection, and liver disorder [n=1]; and pneumonia [n=1]) and none in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group.
Although the difference in overall survival observed between treatment groups was not significant, the safety profile results with long-term follow-up reported here continue to support the use of daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
European Myeloma Network and Janssen Research & Development.
APOLLO 试验的主要分析在中位随访 16.9 个月后进行,结果表明,与泊马度胺和地塞米松相比,达雷妥尤单抗联合泊马度胺和地塞米松显著改善了无进展生存期。在此,我们报告了 APOLLO 的最终总生存期和更新的安全性结果。
APOLLO 是一项在欧洲 12 个国家的 48 个学术中心和医院进行的开放性、随机、3 期临床试验,纳入了年龄在 18 岁及以上的复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者,这些患者的 ECOG 表现状态评分为 0-2 分,接受过至少一线治疗,包括来那度胺和蛋白酶体抑制剂,对之前的一线或以上治疗有部分缓解或更好的反应,且如果只接受过一线治疗,则对来那度胺有耐药性。使用交互式网络响应系统将患者(1:1)随机分配接受达雷妥尤单抗联合泊马度胺和地塞米松或泊马度胺和地塞米松治疗;根据之前的治疗线数和国际分期系统疾病阶段对患者进行分层。口服泊马度胺(4 mg 每日一次;第 1-21 天)和地塞米松(40 mg 每日一次;第 1、8、15 和 22 天)在 28 天周期中使用,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性。达雷妥尤单抗(1800 mg 皮下注射或 16 mg/kg 静脉注射)每周(第 1-2 周期)、每两周(第 3-6 周期)和此后每四周一次。之前报道过的无进展生存期是主要终点,计划中的次要终点是总生存期,这两个终点都在意向治疗人群中进行评估。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT03180736),目前不再招募患者。
在 2017 年 6 月 22 日至 2019 年 6 月 13 日期间,共有 304 名患者被随机分配:151 名患者分到达雷妥尤单抗联合泊马度胺和地塞米松组,153 名患者分到泊马度胺和地塞米松组。中位年龄为 67 岁(IQR 60-72);143(47%)名患者为女性,161(53%)名患者为男性,272(89%)名患者为白人。在中位随访 39.6 个月(IQR 37.1-43.7)时,达雷妥尤单抗联合泊马度胺和地塞米松组的中位总生存期为 34.4 个月(95%CI 23.7-40.3),泊马度胺和地塞米松组为 23.7 个月(19.6-29.4)(风险比[HR] 0.82 [95%CI 0.61-1.11];p=0.20)。最常见的 3-4 级治疗相关不良事件为中性粒细胞减少症(149 例中有 103 例[69%],150 例中有 76 例[51%])、贫血(27 例[18%],28 例[19%])和血小板减少症(27 例[18%],28 例[19%])。达雷妥尤单抗联合泊马度胺和地塞米松组 149 例患者中有 80 例(54%)和泊马度胺和地塞米松组 150 例患者中有 60 例(40%)发生严重治疗相关不良事件,最常见的不良事件是肺炎(23 例[15%],149 例中有 13 例[9%])。达雷妥尤单抗联合泊马度胺和地塞米松组 149 例患者中有 13 例(9%)和泊马度胺和地塞米松组 150 例患者中有 13 例(9%)发生治疗相关不良事件导致死亡,达雷妥尤单抗联合泊马度胺和地塞米松组有 4 例(3%)死亡发生在最后一次治疗剂量后 30 天内,认为与研究治疗相关(休克[1 例];败血症[1 例];骨髓衰竭、空肠弯曲菌感染和肝功能障碍[1 例];肺炎[1 例]),泊马度胺和地塞米松组无此类事件。
尽管治疗组之间的总生存期差异没有统计学意义,但此处报告的长期随访安全性结果继续支持在复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中使用达雷妥尤单抗联合泊马度胺和地塞米松。
欧洲骨髓瘤网络和杨森研发公司。