Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Oct;12(10):957-65. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70194-7. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
New research criteria for preclinical Alzheimer's disease have been proposed, which include stages for cognitively normal individuals with abnormal amyloid markers (stage 1), abnormal amyloid and neuronal injury markers (stage 2), or abnormal amyloid and neuronal injury markers and subtle cognitive changes (stage 3). We aimed to investigate the prevalence and long-term outcome of preclinical Alzheimer's disease according to these criteria.
Participants were cognitively normal (clinical dementia rating [CDR]=0) community-dwelling volunteers aged at least 65 years who were enrolled between 1998 and 2011 at the Washington University School of Medicine (MO, USA). CSF amyloid-β1-42 and tau concentrations and a memory composite score were used to classify participants as normal (both markers normal), preclinical Alzheimer's disease stage 1-3, or suspected non-Alzheimer pathophysiology (SNAP, abnormal injury marker without abnormal amyloid marker). The primary outcome was the proportion of participants in each preclinical AD stage. Secondary outcomes included progression to CDR at least 0·5, symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (score of at least 0·5 for memory and at least one other domain and cognitive impairments deemed to be due to Alzheimer's disease), and mortality. We undertook survival analyses using subdistribution and standard Cox hazards models and linear mixed models.
Of 311 participants, 129 (41%) were classed as normal, 47 (15%) as stage 1, 36 (12%) as stage 2, 13 (4%) as stage 3, 72 (23%) as SNAP, and 14 (5%) remained unclassified. The 5-year progression rate to CDR at least 0·5, symptomatic Alzheimer's disease was 2% for participants classed as normal, 11% for stage 1, 26% for stage 2, 56% for stage 3, and 5% for SNAP. Compared with individuals classed as normal, participants with preclinical Alzheimer's disease had an increased risk of death after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio 6·2, 95% CI 1·1-35·0; p=0·040).
Preclinical Alzheimer's disease is common in cognitively normal elderly people and is associated with future cognitive decline and mortality. Thus, preclinical Alzheimer's disease could be an important target for therapeutic intervention.
National Institute of Aging of the National Institutes of Health (P01-AG003991, P50-AG05681, P01-AG02676), Internationale Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek, the Center for Translational Molecular Medicine project LeARN, the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking, and the Charles and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Research Initiative.
新的临床前阿尔茨海默病研究标准已经提出,包括认知正常个体伴有异常淀粉样蛋白标志物(阶段 1)、异常淀粉样蛋白和神经元损伤标志物(阶段 2)或异常淀粉样蛋白和神经元损伤标志物以及轻微认知变化(阶段 3)的阶段。我们旨在根据这些标准研究临床前阿尔茨海默病的患病率和长期结局。
参与者为认知正常(临床痴呆评定量表[CDR]=0)、居住在社区的、年龄至少 65 岁的志愿者,于 1998 年至 2011 年期间在华盛顿大学医学院(美国密苏里州)入组。CSF 淀粉样蛋白-β1-42 和 tau 浓度以及记忆综合评分用于将参与者分类为正常(两种标志物均正常)、临床前阿尔茨海默病阶段 1-3 或疑似非阿尔茨海默氏病病理生理学(SNAP,异常损伤标志物而无异常淀粉样蛋白标志物)。主要结局是每个临床前 AD 阶段的参与者比例。次要结局包括进展至 CDR 至少 0.5、有症状的阿尔茨海默病(记忆评分至少为 0.5,且至少有一个其他领域和认知障碍被认为是由阿尔茨海默病引起的)和死亡率。我们使用亚分布和标准 Cox 风险模型以及线性混合模型进行生存分析。
在 311 名参与者中,129 名(41%)被归类为正常,47 名(15%)为阶段 1,36 名(12%)为阶段 2,13 名(4%)为阶段 3,72 名(23%)为 SNAP,14 名(5%)仍未分类。正常组参与者进展至 CDR 至少 0.5、有症状的阿尔茨海默病的 5 年进展率为 2%,阶段 1 为 11%,阶段 2 为 26%,阶段 3 为 56%,SNAP 为 5%。与被归类为正常的参与者相比,在调整了协变量后,患有临床前阿尔茨海默病的参与者死亡风险增加(风险比 6.2,95%CI 1.1-35.0;p=0.040)。
临床前阿尔茨海默病在认知正常的老年人中很常见,与未来的认知能力下降和死亡率有关。因此,临床前阿尔茨海默病可能是治疗干预的重要目标。
美国国立卫生研究院国家老龄化研究所(P01-AG003991、P50-AG05681、P01-AG02676)、国际阿尔茨海默病研究基金会、转化分子医学中心项目 LeARN、欧盟/欧洲制药工业协会创新药物倡议联合企业以及查尔斯和乔安妮奈特阿尔茨海默病研究倡议。