Centre for Motor Control, Faculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education, University of Toronto, Canada.
Neurosci Lett. 2013 Oct 25;554:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.08.055. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
According to action-centred models of attention, there is a tight coupling between attention and response planning processes. In support of these models, previous research has shown that reach trajectories deviate towards a cue at short (<100ms) cue-target onset asynchronies (CTOAs) and away from a cue presented at longer CTOAs (>750ms). These deviations resemble the pattern of facilitatory and inhibitory reaction time (RT) effects observed in keypress studies. Here, participants reached to targets following a non-predictive cue and 5 CTOAs (from 100 to 600ms in 125ms intervals) were used to gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between RT and trajectory effects. Consistent with action-centred attention, facilitatory and inhibitory cuing after-effects were present in RTs and trajectories. Interestingly, RT and trajectory effects were temporally staggered: facilitatory effects were present in trajectories at the 100ms CTOA when they had already dissipated in RTs, and inhibitory effects were present in RTs (≥350ms CTOAs) before they were detected in trajectories (600ms CTOA). The time courses of the cuing effects suggest that, although action and attention systems are tightly coupled, the facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms operate in attention before affecting action planning.
根据以行动为中心的注意模型,注意和反应规划过程之间存在紧密的耦合。为了支持这些模型,先前的研究表明,在短 cue-target 起始时间间隔(<100ms)下,到达轨迹会向 cue 偏离,而在较长的 cue-target 起始时间间隔(>750ms)下则会远离 cue。这些偏离类似于在按键研究中观察到的促进和抑制反应时间(RT)效应的模式。在这里,参与者在非预测 cue 后到达目标,使用 5 个 cue-target 起始时间间隔(100 到 600ms,间隔 125ms)来更深入地了解 RT 和轨迹效应之间的关系。与以行动为中心的注意一致,RT 和轨迹上都存在促进和抑制的 cue 后效。有趣的是,RT 和轨迹效应在时间上是错开的:在 RT 中已经消失的 100ms cue-target 起始时间间隔下,促进效应出现在轨迹中,而在 600ms cue-target 起始时间间隔下才出现在轨迹中的抑制效应则出现在 RT 中(≥350ms cue-target 起始时间间隔)。cue 效应的时间过程表明,尽管行动和注意系统紧密耦合,但促进和抑制机制在影响动作规划之前先在注意中起作用。