Weidner Ralph, Müller Hermann J
Cognitive Neuroscience Section, Institute for Neuroscience & Medicine - INM 3, Research Centre Jülich, Juelich, Germany.
J Vis. 2013 Sep 6;13(3):25. doi: 10.1167/13.3.25.
In order to efficiently deploy our limited visual processing resources, we must decide what information is relevant and to be prioritized and what information should rather be ignored. To detect visual information that we know is relevant but that is not very salient, we need to set our system to prioritize and combine information from different visual dimensions (e.g., size, color, motion). Four experiments examined the allocation of processing resources across different visual dimensions when observers searched for a singleton target defined by a conjunction of size (primary dimension: the target was always large) with either color or motion (secondary dimension: variable across trials) within heterogeneously sized, colored, and moving distractors. The results revealed search reaction times to be substantially increased in a given trial in which the secondary target dimension was changed from the preceding trial--indicative of a suboptimal distribution of dimensional weights carried over from the previous trial and of attentional weight being bound by the (need to filter within the) primary dimension, thereby reducing the weight available for processing the secondary dimensions. Semantic precueing of the secondary dimension and visual marking of the search-irrelevant items in the primary dimension reduced these costs significantly. However, observers were limited in their ability to implement both top-down sets simultaneously. These findings argue in favor of a parallel distribution of dimensional processing resources across multiple visual dimensions and, furthermore, that visual marking releases attentional weight bound to the primary dimension, thus permitting more efficient (parallel) processing in the secondary dimensions.
为了有效地部署我们有限的视觉处理资源,我们必须决定哪些信息是相关的且应被优先处理,哪些信息则应被忽略。为了检测我们知道相关但不太显著的视觉信息,我们需要设置我们的系统来优先处理并整合来自不同视觉维度(例如大小、颜色、运动)的信息。当观察者在大小、颜色和运动各异的干扰物中搜索由大小(主要维度:目标总是大的)与颜色或运动(次要维度:每次试验可变)的结合所定义的单一目标时,四个实验考察了跨不同视觉维度的处理资源分配情况。结果显示,在某一试验中,如果次要目标维度与前一试验不同,搜索反应时间会大幅增加——这表明从先前试验延续而来的维度权重分布欠佳,且注意力权重受主要维度(在其中进行筛选的需要)限制,从而减少了可用于处理次要维度的权重。对次要维度进行语义预提示以及对主要维度中与搜索无关的项目进行视觉标记,可显著降低这些成本。然而,观察者同时实施这两种自上而下设置的能力有限。这些发现支持了跨多个视觉维度并行分配维度处理资源的观点,此外,视觉标记释放了与主要维度绑定的注意力权重,从而允许在次要维度中进行更高效的(并行)处理。