Nordfang Maria, Wolfe Jeremy M
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Oester Farimagsgade 2A, 1353, Copenhagen K, Denmark,
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Aug;76(6):1535-59. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0715-2.
A key tenet of feature integration theory and of related theories such as guided search (GS) is that the binding of basic features requires attention. This would seem to predict that conjunctions of features of objects that have not been attended should not influence search. However, Found (1998) reported that an irrelevant feature (size) improved the efficiency of search for a Color × Orientation conjunction if it was correlated with the other two features across the display, as compared to the case in which size was not correlated with color and orientation features. We examined this issue with somewhat different stimuli. We used triple conjunctions of color, orientation, and shape (e.g., search for a red, vertical, oval-shaped item). This allowed us to manipulate the number of features that each distractor shared with the target (sharing) and it allowed us to vary the total number of distractor types (and, thus, the number of groups of identical items: grouping). We found that these triple conjunction searches were generally very efficient--producing very shallow Reaction Time × Set Size slopes, consistent with strong guidance by basic features. Nevertheless, both of the variables, sharing and grouping, modulated performance. These influences were not predicted by previous accounts of GS; however, both can be accommodated in a GS framework. Alternatively, it is possible, though not necessary, to see these effects as evidence for "preattentive binding" of conjunctions.
特征整合理论以及诸如引导搜索(GS)等相关理论的一个关键原则是,基本特征的绑定需要注意力。这似乎预示着,未被注意的物体特征的结合不应影响搜索。然而,方德(1998)报告称,与大小与颜色和方向特征不相关的情况相比,如果一个无关特征(大小)在整个显示中与其他两个特征相关,那么它会提高对颜色×方向结合的搜索效率。我们用稍有不同的刺激来研究这个问题。我们使用了颜色、方向和形状的三联体结合(例如,搜索一个红色、垂直、椭圆形的物品)。这使我们能够操纵每个干扰项与目标共享的特征数量(共享),并且使我们能够改变干扰项类型的总数(从而改变相同物品组的数量:分组)。我们发现,这些三联体结合搜索通常非常高效——产生非常浅的反应时间×集合大小斜率,这与基本特征的强烈引导一致。然而,共享和分组这两个变量都调节了表现。这些影响是之前关于引导搜索的描述所没有预测到的;然而,两者都可以纳入引导搜索框架。或者,有可能(但不是必须)将这些效应视为结合的“前注意绑定”的证据。