Chen Wei-Ping, Lü Si-Dan, Wang Mei-E, Jiao Wen-Tao
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100085, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 May;24(5):1253-62.
Reclaimed water recharge to groundwater is an effective way to relieve water resource crisis. However, reclaimed water contains some pollutants such as nitrate, heavy metals, and new type contaminants, and thus, there exists definite environmental risk in the reclaimed water recharge to groundwater. To promote the development of reclaimed water recharge to groundwater and the safe use of reclaimed water in China, this paper analyzed the relevant literatures and practical experiences around the world, and summarized the effects of different reclaimed water recharge modes on the groundwater quality. Surface recharge makes the salt and nitrate contents in groundwater increased but the risk of heavy metals pollution be smaller, whereas well recharge can induce the arsenic release from sedimentary aquifers, which needs to be paid more attention to. New type contaminants are the hotspots in current researches, and their real risks are unknown. Pathogens have less pollution risks on groundwater, but some virus with strong activity can have the risks. Some suggestions were put forward to reduce the risks associated with the reclaimed water recharge to groundwater in China.
再生水回灌地下水是缓解水资源危机的有效途径。然而,再生水中含有硝酸盐、重金属和新型污染物等一些污染物,因此,再生水回灌地下水存在一定的环境风险。为推动我国再生水回灌地下水的发展以及再生水的安全利用,本文分析了国内外相关文献和实践经验,总结了不同再生水回灌模式对地下水水质的影响。地表回灌使地下水中盐分和硝酸盐含量增加,但重金属污染风险较小,而井灌可能导致沉积含水层中砷的释放,需要予以更多关注。新型污染物是当前研究的热点,其实际风险尚不清楚。病原体对地下水的污染风险较小,但一些活性较强的病毒可能存在风险。针对降低我国再生水回灌地下水相关风险提出了一些建议。