Suppr超能文献

中国城市固体废物卫生填埋过程中的温室气体排放:废物特性和 LFG 处理措施的影响。

Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China: influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, PR China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:510-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.039. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

Abstract

Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment can be highly cost-effective in terms of GHG mitigation. This study investigated GHG emissions during MSW landfilling in China under four existing scenarios and in terms of seven different categories: waste collection and transportation, landfill management, leachate treatment, fugitive CH4 (FM) emissions, substitution of electricity production, carbon sequestration and N2O and CO emissions. GHG emissions from simple sanitary landfilling technology where no landfill gas (LFG) extraction took place (Scenario 1) were higher (641-998 kg CO2-eq·t(-1)ww) than those from open dump (Scenario 0, 480-734 kg CO2-eq·t(-1)ww). This was due to the strictly anaerobic conditions in Scenario 1. LFG collection and treatment reduced GHG emissions to 448-684 kg CO2-eq·t(-1)ww in Scenario 2 (with LFG flare) and 214-277 kg CO2-eq·t(-1)ww in Scenario 3 (using LFG for electricity production). Amongst the seven categories, FM was the predominant contributor to GHG emissions. Global sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the parameters associated with waste characteristics (i.e. CH4 potential and carbon sequestered faction) and LFG management (i.e. LFG collection efficiency and CH4 oxidation efficiency) were of great importance. A further learning on the MSW in China indicated that water content and dry matter content of food waste were the basic factors affecting GHG emissions. Source separation of food waste, as well as increasing the incineration ratio of mixed collected MSW, could effectively mitigate the overall GHG emissions from landfilling in a specific city. To increase the LFG collection and CH4 oxidation efficiencies could considerably reduce GHG emissions on the landfill site level. While, the improvement in the LFG utilization measures had an insignificant impact as long as the LFG is recovered for energy generation.

摘要

减少城市固体废物(MSW)处理产生的温室气体(GHG)排放,在 GHG 减排方面具有很高的成本效益。本研究调查了中国现有四种情景下的 MSW 填埋场的 GHG 排放,并按七种不同类别进行了分析:废物收集和运输、垃圾填埋场管理、渗滤液处理、逸散性 CH4(FM)排放、电力生产替代、碳封存和 N2O 和 CO 排放。与不进行垃圾填埋气(LFG)提取的简易卫生填埋技术(情景 1)相比,开放式垃圾场(情景 0,480-734kg CO2-eq·t(-1)ww)的 GHG 排放量更高(641-998kg CO2-eq·t(-1)ww)。这是由于情景 1 中严格的厌氧条件所致。在情景 2(采用 LFG 火炬燃烧)和情景 3(利用 LFG 进行发电)中,收集和处理 LFG 将 GHG 排放量减少至 448-684kg CO2-eq·t(-1)ww 和 214-277kg CO2-eq·t(-1)ww。在这七种类别中,FM 是 GHG 排放的主要贡献者。全局敏感性分析表明,与废物特性(即 CH4 潜力和碳封存分数)和 LFG 管理(即 LFG 收集效率和 CH4 氧化效率)相关的参数非常重要。对中国 MSW 的进一步研究表明,厨余垃圾的水分含量和干物质含量是影响 GHG 排放的基本因素。厨余垃圾的源头分类以及提高混合收集 MSW 的焚烧比例,可有效减少特定城市填埋场的整体 GHG 排放。提高 LFG 收集和 CH4 氧化效率可以显著减少垃圾填埋场层面的 GHG 排放。然而,只要 LFG 用于发电,提高 LFG 利用措施的效果并不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验