Suppr超能文献

系统评价癌症患者口腔黏膜炎管理中的基本口腔护理。

Systematic review of basic oral care for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients.

机构信息

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Nursing, Richmond, VA, USA,

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2013 Nov;21(11):3165-77. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1942-0. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this project was to evaluate research in basic oral care interventions to update evidence-based practice guidelines for preventing and treating oral mucositis (OM) in cancer patients undergoing radio- or chemotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic review of available literature was conducted by the Basic Oral Care Section of the Mucositis Study Group of MASCC/ISOO. Seven interventions--oral care protocols, dental care, normal saline, sodium bicarbonate, mixed medication mouthwash, chlorhexidine, and calcium phosphate--were evaluated using the Hadorn (J Clin Epidemiol 49:749-754, 1996) criteria to determine level of evidence, followed by a guideline determination of one of the following: recommendation, suggestion, or no guideline possible, using Somerfield's (Classic Pap Cur Comments 4:881-886, 2000) schema.

RESULTS

Fifty-two published papers were examined by treatment population (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant) and by whether the intervention aimed to prevent or treat OM. The resulting practice suggestions included using oral care protocols for preventing OM across all treatment modalities and age groups and not using chlorhexidine mouthwash for preventing OM in adults with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Considering inadequate and/or conflicting evidence, no guidelines for prevention or treatment of OM were possible for the interventions of dental care, normal saline, sodium bicarbonate, mixed medication mouthwash, chlorhexidine in patients receiving chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplant, or calcium phosphate.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for basic oral care interventions supports the use of oral care protocols in patient populations receiving radiation and/or chemotherapy and does not support chlorhexidine for prevention of mucositis in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Additional well-designed research is needed for other interventions to improve the amount and quality of evidence guiding future clinical care.

摘要

目的

本项目旨在评估基本口腔护理干预措施的研究,以更新癌症患者接受放化疗时预防和治疗口腔黏膜炎(OM)的循证实践指南。

方法

MASCC/ISOO 口腔黏膜炎研究小组的基础口腔护理组进行了系统的文献回顾。使用 Hadorn(J Clin Epidemiol 49:749-754, 1996)标准评估了 7 种干预措施(口腔护理方案、牙科护理、生理盐水、碳酸氢钠、混合药物漱口液、洗必泰、磷酸钙),以确定证据水平,然后根据 Somerfield(Classic Pap Cur Comments 4:881-886, 2000)方案确定以下一种指南建议:推荐、建议或无可能的指南。

结果

根据治疗人群(放疗、化疗和造血干细胞移植)和干预措施是预防还是治疗 OM,共检查了 52 篇已发表的论文。最终的实践建议包括在所有治疗方式和年龄组中使用口腔护理方案预防 OM,以及在头颈部癌症接受放疗的成人中不使用洗必泰漱口液预防 OM。考虑到证据不足和/或相互矛盾,对于牙科护理、生理盐水、碳酸氢钠、混合药物漱口液、化疗或造血干细胞移植患者的洗必泰以及磷酸钙等干预措施,预防或治疗 OM 均无可能制定指南。

结论

基本口腔护理干预措施的证据支持在接受放疗和/或化疗的患者群体中使用口腔护理方案,并且不支持在接受放疗的头颈部癌症患者中使用洗必泰预防黏膜炎。需要进行更多设计良好的研究,以改善其他干预措施的证据数量和质量,从而为未来的临床护理提供指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验