University of Connecticut Health Center, Department of Psychiatry MC1410, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;74(8):841-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m08030.
Maltreatment, family violence, and disruption in primary caregiver attachment in childhood may constitute a developmental form of trauma that places children at risk for multiple psychiatric and medical diagnoses that often are refractory to well-established evidence-based mental health treatments. No integrative diagnosis exists to guide assessment and treatment for these children and adolescents. This study therefore assessed clinicians' ratings of the clinical utility of a proposed developmental trauma disorder diagnostic framework.
An Internet survey was conducted with an international convenience sample of 472 self-selected medical, mental health, counseling, child welfare, and education professionals. Respondents made quantitative ratings of the clinical significance of developmental trauma disorder, developmental trauma exposure, and symptom items and also posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other Axis I internalizing and externalizing disorder symptom items for 4 clinical vignettes. Ratings of the discriminability of each developmental trauma disorder item from PTSD, other anxiety disorders, affective disorders, and externalizing behavior disorders, and of each developmental trauma disorder item's amenability to existing evidence-based treatments for those disorders, also were obtained.
Respondents viewed developmental trauma disorder criteria as (1) comparable in clinical utility to criteria for PTSD and other psychiatric disorders; (2) discriminable from and not fully accounted for by other disorders; and (3) refractory to existing evidence-based psychotherapeutic treatments.
The exposure and symptom criteria proposed for a developmental trauma disorder diagnosis warrant clinical dissemination and scientific field testing to determine their actual clinical utility in treating traumatized children with complex psychiatric presentations.
儿童期的虐待、家庭暴力和主要照顾者依恋中断可能构成一种发展性创伤形式,使儿童面临多种精神和医学诊断的风险,而这些诊断往往对既定的循证心理健康治疗方法具有抵抗力。目前还没有综合诊断来指导这些儿童和青少年的评估和治疗。因此,本研究评估了临床医生对拟议的发展性创伤障碍诊断框架的临床实用性的评价。
通过互联网对 472 名自我选择的医学、心理健康、咨询、儿童福利和教育专业人员进行了一项国际便利样本调查。受访者对发展性创伤障碍、发展性创伤暴露和症状项目的临床意义进行了定量评分,还对 4 个临床案例中的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和其他轴 I 内隐和外显障碍症状项目进行了评分。还获得了每个发展性创伤障碍项目与 PTSD、其他焦虑障碍、情感障碍和外显行为障碍的区分度,以及每个发展性创伤障碍项目对这些障碍的现有循证治疗的顺应性的评分。
受访者认为发展性创伤障碍标准(1)与 PTSD 和其他精神障碍的标准具有相当的临床实用性;(2)与其他障碍可区分且不完全由其他障碍解释;(3)对现有的循证心理治疗方法具有抵抗力。
提出的发展性创伤障碍诊断的暴露和症状标准值得临床推广和科学领域测试,以确定它们在治疗具有复杂精神表现的创伤儿童方面的实际临床实用性。