Altmann Christian F, Hiraumi Harukazu, Terada Satoshi, Adachi Tsunemichi, Votinov Mikhail, Ono Kentaro, Mima Tatsuya, Fukuyama Hidenao
aHuman Brain Research Center bDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine cCareer-Path Promotion Unit for Young Life Scientists, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Neuroreport. 2013 Oct 23;24(15):861-5. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000006.
Localization of sound sources is critical for an appropriate behavioral response. This is not only true for localization in the horizontal plane but also for localization in depth. Depth ranging of sound sources implicates various distance cues, among others sound intensity. In this study, we measured human electroencephalography and compared mismatch negativity (MMN) amplitudes and latencies for horizontal motion, radial motion, and pure intensity changes in the free field. We observed similar MMN latencies for horizontal and radial motion, whereas MMN responses to pure intensity changes were comparably delayed. MMN amplitudes and latencies were not different for approaching and receding sounds. Our data suggest similar fast processing for horizontal and radial motion, whereas pure intensity changes are possibly processed with less priority.
声源定位对于做出适当的行为反应至关重要。这不仅适用于在水平面内的定位,也适用于深度定位。声源的深度测距涉及多种距离线索,其中包括声音强度。在本研究中,我们测量了人类脑电图,并比较了自由场中水平运动、径向运动和纯强度变化的失配负波(MMN)的振幅和潜伏期。我们观察到水平运动和径向运动的MMN潜伏期相似,而对纯强度变化的MMN反应则相对延迟。接近和远离声音的MMN振幅和潜伏期没有差异。我们的数据表明,水平运动和径向运动的处理速度相似,而纯强度变化的处理优先级可能较低。