Kim Eung Ju, Song Woo-Hyuk, Lee Jae Ung, Shin Mi-Seung, Lee Sahng, Kim Byeong-Ok, Hong Kyeong-Sun, Han Seong Woo, Park Chang Gyu, Seo Hong Seog
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.
Hypertens Res. 2014 Jan;37(1):50-6. doi: 10.1038/hr.2013.112. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers have shown clinical outcomes superior to those of the beta (β)-blocker atenolol, despite similar reductions in the peripheral blood pressure (BP), perhaps because of different impacts on central hemodynamics. However, few comparative studies of RAS blockers and newer vasodilating β-blockers have been performed. We compared the central hemodynamic effects of losartan and carvedilol in a prospective, randomized, open, blinded end point study. Of the 201 hypertensive patients enrolled, 182 (49.6±9.9 years, losartan group=88 and carvedilol group=94) were analyzed. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), aortic augmentation index (AIx), AIx corrected for a heart rate (HR) of 75 beats per minute (AIx@HR75) and central BP were measured noninvasively at baseline and after a 24-week treatment regimen with losartan or carvedilol. After 24 weeks, there were no between-group differences in the brachial BP, cfPWV, AIx@HR75 or central BP changes, except for a more favorable AIx effect with losartan. The changes in all measured metabolic and inflammatory parameters were also not significantly different between the two groups, except for uric acid. Losartan and carvedilol showed generally comparable effects on central hemodynamic indices, metabolic profile, inflammatory parameters and peripheral arterial pressure with a 24-week treatment.
肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)阻滞剂已显示出优于β受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔的临床效果,尽管二者对外周血压(BP)的降低幅度相似,这可能是由于它们对中心血流动力学的影响不同。然而,针对RAS阻滞剂与新型血管舒张性β受体阻滞剂的比较研究却很少。我们在一项前瞻性、随机、开放、双盲终点研究中比较了氯沙坦和卡维地洛对中心血流动力学的影响。在纳入的201例高血压患者中,对182例(年龄49.6±9.9岁,氯沙坦组88例,卡维地洛组94例)进行了分析。在基线以及接受氯沙坦或卡维地洛24周治疗方案后,采用无创方法测量颈股脉搏波速度(cfPWV)、主动脉增强指数(AIx)、校正心率(HR)为每分钟75次时的AIx(AIx@HR75)以及中心血压。24周后,除氯沙坦对AIx的影响更有利外,两组间肱动脉血压、cfPWV、AIx@HR75或中心血压变化无差异。除尿酸外,两组间所有测量的代谢和炎症参数变化也无显著差异。氯沙坦和卡维地洛在24周治疗后对中心血流动力学指标、代谢谱、炎症参数和外周动脉压的影响总体相当。