Suppr超能文献

在接受二甲双胍单药基础治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,卡格列净与安慰剂和西格列汀相比的疗效和安全性:一项随机试验。

Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin monotherapy: a randomised trial.

作者信息

Lavalle-González F J, Januszewicz A, Davidson J, Tong C, Qiu R, Canovatchel W, Meininger G

机构信息

Endocrinology and Internal Medicine Department, Universidad Autonóma de Nuevo León, Avenida Madero y Gonzalitos, S/N Col. Mitras Centro, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico,

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2013 Dec;56(12):2582-92. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-3039-1. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin vs placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes who were being treated with background metformin.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, four-arm, parallel-group, Phase 3 study was conducted at 169 centres in 22 countries between April 2010 and August 2012. Participants (N = 1,284) with type 2 diabetes aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years who had inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7.0% [53 mmol/mol] and ≤10.5% [91 mmol/mol]) on metformin therapy received canagliflozin 100 mg or 300 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg, or placebo (n = 368, 367, 366, 183, respectively) for a 26 week, placebo- and active-controlled period followed by a 26 week, active-controlled period (placebo group switched to sitagliptin [placebo/sitagliptin]) and were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis set. Randomisation was performed using a computer-generated schedule; participants, study centres and the sponsor were blinded to group assignment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 26; secondary endpoints included changes in HbA1c (week 52) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, and systolic blood pressure (BP; weeks 26 and 52). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study.

RESULTS

At week 26, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg reduced HbA1c vs placebo (-0.79%, -0.94%, -0.17%, respectively; p < 0.001). At week 52, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg demonstrated non-inferiority, and canagliflozin 300 mg demonstrated statistical superiority, to sitagliptin in lowering HbA1c (-0.73%, -0.88%,-0.73%, respectively); differences (95% CI) vs sitagliptin were 0% (-0.12, 0.12) and -0.15% (-0.27, -0.03), respectively. Canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg reduced body weight vs placebo (week 26: -3.7%, -4.2%, -1.2%, respectively; p < 0.001) and sitagliptin (week 52: -3.8%, -4.2%, -1.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). Both canagliflozin doses reduced FPG and systolic BP vs placebo (week 26) and sitagliptin (week 52) (p < 0.001). Overall AE and AE-related discontinuation rates were generally similar across groups, but higher with canagliflozin 100 mg. Genital mycotic infection and osmotic diuresis-related AE rates were higher with canagliflozin; few led to discontinuations. Hypoglycaemia incidence was higher with canagliflozin.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Canagliflozin improved glycaemia and reduced body weight vs placebo (week 26) and sitagliptin (week 52) and was generally well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01106677 FUNDING: This study was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.

摘要

目的/假设:本研究旨在评估卡格列净与安慰剂及西格列汀相比,在接受二甲双胍基础治疗的2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

本随机、双盲、四臂、平行组3期研究于2010年4月至2012年8月在22个国家的169个中心进行。年龄在18至80岁之间、二甲双胍治疗血糖控制不佳(糖化血红蛋白≥7.0%[53 mmol/mol]且≤10.5%[91 mmol/mol])的2型糖尿病患者(N = 1284)接受卡格列净100 mg或300 mg、西格列汀100 mg或安慰剂(分别为n = 368、367、366、183)治疗26周,这一阶段为安慰剂和活性药物对照期,随后是26周的活性药物对照期(安慰剂组换用西格列汀[安慰剂/西格列汀]),并纳入改良意向性分析集。随机分组采用计算机生成的方案;参与者、研究中心和申办方均对分组情况不知情。主要终点是第26周时糖化血红蛋白相对于基线的变化;次要终点包括糖化血红蛋白(第52周)、空腹血糖(FPG)、体重和收缩压(BP;第26周和第52周)的变化。在整个研究过程中记录不良事件(AE)。

结果

在第26周时,卡格列净100 mg和300 mg组相对于安慰剂组降低了糖化血红蛋白(分别为-0.79%、-0.94%、-0.17%;p < 0.001)。在第5周时,卡格列净100 mg和300 mg组在降低糖化血红蛋白方面显示出非劣效性,且卡格列净300 mg组显示出统计学优越性,相对于西格列汀(分别为-0.73%、-0.88%、-0.73%);与西格列汀相比的差异(95%CI)分别为0%(-0.12,0.12)和-0.15%(- .27,-0.03)。卡格列净100 mg和300 mg组相对于安慰剂组(第26周:分别为-3.7%、-4.2%、-1.2%;p < 0.001)和西格列汀组(第52周:分别为-3.8%、-4.2%、-1.3%;p < 0.001)降低了体重。两种卡格列净剂量相对于安慰剂组(第26周)和西格列汀组(第52周)均降低了空腹血糖和收缩压(p < 0.001)。各组总体不良事件及与不良事件相关的停药率一般相似,但卡格列净100 mg组较高。卡格列净组生殖器真菌感染和渗透性利尿相关不良事件发生率较高;很少导致停药。卡格列净组低血糖发生率较高。

结论/解读:与安慰剂(第26周)和西格列汀(第52周)相比,卡格列净改善了血糖水平并减轻了体重,且在接受二甲双胍治疗的2型糖尿病患者中总体耐受性良好。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01106677 资助:本研究由杨森研发有限责任公司资助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3286/3825495/63ba79cb562c/125_2013_3039_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验