Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China,
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Jan;59(1):161-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2868-6. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with fluoroscopy guidance is a well-established technique for providing biliary drainage in patients with biliary obstructions. However, fluoroscopic facilities may not always be available and fluoroscopy carries a risk of radiation exposure.
We retrospectively compared the procedure success rate and efficacy of ultrasound-guided endoscopic biliary drainage (UG-EBD) and fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic biliary drainage (FG-EBD) in patients with biliary obstructions.
Patients who had received either UG-EBD or FG-EBD were included in the study. Main outcome measurements included the procedure success rate, procedure time, and clinical response.
A total of 125 patients who had undergone UG-EBD (n = 63) and FG-EBD (n = 62) were identified. The total procedure success rate was 93.7 % in the UG-EBD group and 96.8 % in the FG-EBD group without statistical difference. Also, no significant difference was found in the procedure success rate of lower or upper/middle obstructions of the common bile duct (CBD) between the 2 groups. The mean procedure time was not different between the 2 groups [UG-EBD group 24.54 (9.52) min vs. FG-EBD group 21.74 (8.77) min, p = 0.09]. There were no differences in the normalization of clinical and laboratory parameters and immediate complication between the 2 groups.
Endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) under US-guidance and under fluoroscopy guidance is equally effective and safe for patients with lower or upper/middle obstructions of the CBD. The UG-EBD technique is especially suitable for special patients, such as critically ill patients, pregnant woman, etc.
在有胆道阻塞的患者中,荧光镜引导下的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术是一种成熟的胆道引流技术。然而,荧光镜设备并非总是可用,并且荧光镜检查有辐射暴露的风险。
我们回顾性比较了超声引导下内镜胆道引流术(UG-EBD)和荧光镜引导下内镜胆道引流术(FG-EBD)在胆道阻塞患者中的成功率和疗效。
本研究纳入了接受 UG-EBD 或 FG-EBD 的患者。主要观察指标包括操作成功率、操作时间和临床反应。
共纳入 125 例接受 UG-EBD(n=63)和 FG-EBD(n=62)的患者。UG-EBD 组的总操作成功率为 93.7%,FG-EBD 组为 96.8%,差异无统计学意义。此外,两组在胆总管(CBD)下段或中上段阻塞的操作成功率上也无显著差异。两组间的平均操作时间无差异[UG-EBD 组 24.54(9.52)min 与 FG-EBD 组 21.74(8.77)min,p=0.09]。两组在临床和实验室参数的正常化以及即刻并发症方面也无差异。
对于 CBD 下段或中上段阻塞的患者,超声引导下和荧光镜引导下的胆道引流术(EBD)同样有效且安全。UG-EBD 技术特别适用于特殊患者,如危重症患者、孕妇等。