Suppr超能文献

比较两种定量实时 CMV-PCR 检测方法,这两种方法均经过校准,以符合用于肾移植患者病毒载量监测的第 1 个世界卫生组织国际标准。

Comparison of two quantitative real-time CMV-PCR tests calibrated against the 1st WHO international standard for viral load monitoring of renal transplant patients.

机构信息

Department of Virology, Helsinki University Hospital (HUSLAB), and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 2014 Apr;86(4):576-84. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23733. Epub 2013 Sep 11.

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication in organ transplant recipients is commonly diagnosed by quantitative PCR methods. However, there has been a poor inter-laboratory correlation of viral load values due to the lack of an international reference standard. In a recent study, the COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® (CAP/CTM) CMV test calibrated to the 1st WHO CMV standard, showed good reproducibility in CMV load values across multiple laboratories. Fifty-seven follow-up plasma specimens from 10 kidney transplant recipients with CMV replication were examined using the new quantitative CAP/CTM CMV test and the "in-house" quantitative CMV real-time PCR method, also calibrated against the 1st WHO CMV standard for their clinical applicability for monitoring CMV load in renal transplant patients. By CAP/CTM CMV test 49/57 specimens were CMV-DNA positive compared to 44/57 by the "in-house" PCR test. The "in-house" PCR and CAP/CTM CMV test correlated well in monitoring individual kidney transplant patients. Conversion of the CMV-DNA copies to IUs made the results of the "in-house" PCR and CAP/CTM CMV test less uniform in analysis of the patient samples. In specimens of one patient, significant underquantification of CMV load with "in-house" PCR emerged during follow-up due to a point mutation in the "in-house" PCR primer sequence. The CAP/CTM CMV test was found suitable for diagnosing and monitoring CMV replication in renal transplant patients. Multicenter studies are needed to provide more information of the commutability of the 1st WHO CMV standard and to define the clinical thresholds.

摘要

巨细胞病毒 (CMV) 在器官移植受者中的复制通常通过定量 PCR 方法诊断。然而,由于缺乏国际参考标准,病毒载量值的实验室间相关性一直很差。在最近的一项研究中,经过 1 期 WHO CMV 标准校准的 COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® (CAP/CTM) CMV 检测方法在多个实验室中显示出 CMV 载量值的良好重现性。使用新的定量 CAP/CTM CMV 检测方法和“内部”定量 CMV 实时 PCR 方法检测了 10 名肾移植后 CMV 复制患者的 57 份随访血浆标本,该方法也经过 1 期 WHO CMV 标准校准,以评估其在监测肾移植患者 CMV 载量方面的临床适用性。通过 CAP/CTM CMV 检测,与“内部”PCR 检测的 44/57 相比,有 49/57 个标本为 CMV-DNA 阳性。“内部”PCR 和 CAP/CTM CMV 检测在监测个体肾移植患者方面相关性良好。将 CMV-DNA 拷贝数转换为 IU 后,“内部”PCR 和 CAP/CTM CMV 检测分析患者样本的结果变得不那么一致。在一名患者的标本中,由于“内部”PCR 引物序列中的点突变,在随访过程中出现了 CMV 载量的明显低估。发现 CAP/CTM CMV 检测方法适合于诊断和监测肾移植患者的 CMV 复制。需要进行多中心研究,以提供更多关于 1 期 WHO CMV 标准的互换性的信息,并定义临床阈值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验