Institute for Improvement of Education, Fabrisova 10, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Nov;34(11):3789-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.035. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
This study investigated aggressive behaviour in Serbian adolescents with intellectual disability (ID) compared to typically developing peers. The sample consisted of both male and female adolescents aged 12-18 years. One hundred of the adolescents had ID, and 348 adolescents did not have ID. The adolescents were asked to complete the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ), and their teachers provided ratings of aggression for the adolescents using the Children's Scale of Hostility and Aggression: Reactive-Proactive (C-SHARP). Results indicated that adolescents reported a higher prevalence of aggressive behaviour than their teachers. Reactive aggression was more prevalent than proactive aggression in both subsamples. In the subsample of adolescents with ID, there were no sex or age differences for aggression. However, in the normative subsample, boys and older adolescents scored significantly higher on aggression. According to adolescent self-reports the prevalence of aggression was higher in adolescents without ID, while teachers perceived aggressive behaviour to be more prevalent in adolescents with ID. Scientific and practical implications are discussed.
本研究调查了塞尔维亚智障青少年(ID)与普通发育同龄人相比的攻击行为。样本包括 12 至 18 岁的男女青少年。其中 100 名青少年有智力障碍,348 名青少年没有智力障碍。研究要求青少年完成反应性-主动性攻击问卷(RPQ),并由他们的老师使用儿童敌意和攻击量表:反应性-主动性(C-SHARP)对青少年的攻击行为进行评分。结果表明,青少年报告的攻击行为比老师多。在两个样本中,反应性攻击比主动性攻击更为普遍。在有 ID 的青少年样本中,攻击行为在性别和年龄上没有差异。然而,在正常发育的青少年样本中,男孩和年龄较大的青少年在攻击性得分上显著更高。根据青少年的自我报告,无智力障碍的青少年的攻击性更为普遍,而教师认为有智力障碍的青少年的攻击性更为普遍。讨论了科学和实践的意义。