Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2014 Jan;34(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s10571-013-9984-x. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
Cannabinoid (CB) ligands have demonstrated neuroprotective properties. In this study we compared the effects of a diverse set of CB ligands against β amyloid-mediated neuronal toxicity and activated microglial-conditioned media-based neurotoxicity in vitro, and compared this with a capacity to directly alter β amyloid (Aβ) fibril or aggregate formation. Neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells were exposed to Aβ1-42 directly or microglial (BV-2 cells) conditioned media activated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the presence of the CB1 receptor-selective agonist ACEA, CB2 receptor-selective agonist JWH-015, phytocannabinoids Δ(9)-THC and cannabidiol (CBD), the endocannabinoids 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) and anandamide or putative GPR18/GPR55 ligands O-1602 and abnormal-cannabidiol (Abn-CBD). TNF-α and nitrite production was measured in BV-2 cells to compare activation via LPS or albumin with Aβ1-42. Aβ1-42 evoked a concentration-dependent loss of cell viability in SH-SY5Y cells but negligible TNF-α and nitrite production in BV-2 cells compared to albumin or LPS. Both albumin and LPS-activated BV-2 conditioned media significantly reduced neuronal cell viability but were directly innocuous to SH-SY5Y cells. Of those CB ligands tested, only 2-AG and CBD were directly protective against Aβ-evoked SH-SY5Y cell viability, whereas JWH-015, THC, CBD, Abn-CBD and O-1602 all protected SH-SY5Y cells from BV-2 conditioned media activated via LPS. While CB ligands variably altered the morphology of Aβ fibrils and aggregates, there was no clear correlation between effects on Aβ morphology and neuroprotective actions. These findings indicate a neuroprotective action of CB ligands via actions at microglial and neuronal cells.
大麻素(CB)配体已表现出神经保护特性。在这项研究中,我们比较了一组不同的 CB 配体对β淀粉样蛋白介导的神经元毒性和体外激活的小胶质细胞条件培养基介导的神经毒性的作用,并将其与直接改变β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)纤维或聚集体形成的能力进行了比较。将神经母细胞瘤(SH-SY5Y)细胞暴露于 Aβ1-42 直接或用脂多糖(LPS)激活的小胶质细胞(BV-2 细胞)条件培养基中,同时存在 CB1 受体选择性激动剂 ACEA、CB2 受体选择性激动剂 JWH-015、植物大麻素 Δ(9)-THC 和大麻二酚(CBD)、内源性大麻素 2-花生四烯酸甘油(2-AG)和大麻素酰胺或假定的 GPR18/GPR55 配体 O-1602 和异常大麻二酚(Abn-CBD)。测量了 BV-2 细胞中的 TNF-α 和亚硝酸盐产生,以比较通过 LPS 或白蛋白与 Aβ1-42 的激活。与白蛋白或 LPS 相比,Aβ1-42 诱发 SH-SY5Y 细胞中浓度依赖性的细胞活力丧失,但在 BV-2 细胞中几乎没有 TNF-α 和亚硝酸盐产生。白蛋白和 LPS 激活的 BV-2 条件培养基均显著降低神经元细胞活力,但对 SH-SY5Y 细胞直接无害。在所测试的 CB 配体中,只有 2-AG 和 CBD 直接对 Aβ 引起的 SH-SY5Y 细胞活力具有保护作用,而 JWH-015、THC、CBD、Abn-CBD 和 O-1602 均保护 SH-SY5Y 细胞免受 LPS 激活的 BV-2 条件培养基的侵害。虽然 CB 配体改变了 Aβ 纤维和聚集体的形态,但它们对 Aβ 形态的影响与神经保护作用之间没有明显的相关性。这些发现表明 CB 配体通过作用于小胶质细胞和神经元细胞发挥神经保护作用。