Suppr超能文献

优化在院实施高级生命支持(ALS)期间的循环时长,适用于初始非颤动感官节律的患者。

Optimal loop duration during the provision of in-hospital advanced life support (ALS) to patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm.

机构信息

Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, NO-1441 Drøbak, Norway; St. Olav University Hospital, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway.

University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2014 Jan;85(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.08.261. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In advanced life support (ALS), time-cycled "loops" of chest compressions form the basis of action. However, the provider must compromise between interrupting compressions and detecting a change in cardiac rhythm. An "optimal" loop duration would best balance these choices. The current international CPR guidelines recommend 2-min loop durations. The aim of this study was to investigate the "optimal" loop duration in patients with initial asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Detailed defibrillator recordings from 249 in-hospital cardiac arrests at the University of Chicago Medicine (Chicago, IL) and St. Olav University Hospital (Trondheim, Norway) were analysed. The clinical states of asystole, PEA, ventricular fibrillation/-tachycardia (VF/VT) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were annotated along the time axis. PEA and asystole were combined as a single state for the analysis of state development. The probability of staying in PEA/asystole over time was estimated non-parametrically. In addition, to distinguish between initial and secondary PEA/asystole, the latter was defined by the transition from VF/VT or ROSC.

RESULTS

Among patients with initial PEA (n=179), 25% and 50% of patients had left PEA/asystole after 4 and 9 min of ALS efforts, respectively. The corresponding time points for patients with initial asystole (n=70) were 7.3 and 13.3 min, respectively. The probability of transition from secondary PEA/asystole to ROSC or VF/VT varied between 10% and 20% in each 2-4 min interval.

CONCLUSION

The "optimal" first loop duration may be 4 min in initial PEA and 6-8 min in initial asystole. If secondary PEA/asystole is encountered, 2-min loop duration seems appropriate.

摘要

背景

在高级生命支持(ALS)中,时间循环的“循环”构成了行动的基础。然而,提供者必须在中断按压和检测到心脏节律变化之间做出妥协。“最佳”循环持续时间将最佳平衡这些选择。目前的国际 CPR 指南建议循环持续时间为 2 分钟。本研究旨在调查初始心搏停止或无脉性电活动(PEA)患者的“最佳”循环持续时间。

材料和方法

分析了来自芝加哥大学医学中心(芝加哥,IL)和特隆赫姆圣奥拉夫大学医院(特隆赫姆,挪威)的 249 例院内心脏骤停的详细除颤器记录。沿时间轴注释了心搏停止、PEA、心室颤动/心动过速(VF/VT)和自主循环恢复(ROSC)的临床状态。将 PEA 和心搏停止合并为一个单一状态进行状态发展分析。使用非参数方法估计随着时间推移停留在 PEA/心搏停止中的概率。此外,为了区分初始和继发性 PEA/心搏停止,将后者定义为从 VF/VT 或 ROSC 转变而来。

结果

在初始 PEA 患者(n=179)中,分别有 25%和 50%的患者在 ALS 努力 4 分钟和 9 分钟后出现左 PEA/心搏停止,相应的时间点对于初始心搏停止患者(n=70)分别为 7.3 分钟和 13.3 分钟。从继发性 PEA/心搏停止向 ROSC 或 VF/VT 转变的概率在每个 2-4 分钟间隔内为 10%-20%。

结论

初始 PEA 的“最佳”第一个循环持续时间可能为 4 分钟,初始心搏停止的持续时间为 6-8 分钟。如果遇到继发性 PEA/心搏停止,2 分钟的循环持续时间似乎是合适的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验