Goto Yoshikazu, Maeda Tetsuo, Nakatsu-Goto Yumiko
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 22;18(5):528. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0528-7.
The prognostic significance of conversion from nonshockable to shockable rhythms in patients with initial nonshockable rhythms who experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains unclear. We hypothesized that the neurological outcomes in those patients would improve with subsequent shock delivery following conversion to shockable rhythms and that the time from initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by emergency medical services personnel to the first defibrillation (shock delivery time) would influence those outcomes.
We analyzed the data of 569,937 OHCA adults with initial nonshockable rhythms. The data were collected in a nationwide Utstein-style Japanese database between 2005 and 2010. Patients were divided into subsequently shocked (n =21,944) and subsequently not-shocked (n =547,993) cohorts. The primary study endpoint was 1-month favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Categories scale, category 1 or 2).
In the subsequently shocked cohort, the ratio of 1-month favorable neurological outcome was significantly higher than that in the subsequently not-shocked cohort (1.79% versus 0.60%, P <0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for 11 prehospital variables revealed that when the shock delivery time was less than 20 minutes, subsequent shock delivery was significantly associated with increased odds of 1-month favorable neurological outcomes (adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval), 6.55 (5.21 to 8.22) and 2.97 (2.58 to 3.43) for shock delivery times less than 10 minutes and from 10 to 19 minutes, respectively). However, when the shock delivery time was more than or equal to 20 minutes, subsequent shock delivery was not associated with increased odds of 1-month favorable neurological outcomes.
In patients with an initial nonshockable rhythm after OHCA, subsequent conversion to shockable rhythms during emergency medical services resuscitation efforts was associated with increased odds of 1-month favorable neurological outcomes when the shock delivery time was less than 20 minutes.
院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者最初心律不可电击复律但随后转变为可电击复律的预后意义仍不明确。我们假设,这些患者在转变为可电击复律后进行后续电击治疗,其神经学预后会得到改善,并且从紧急医疗服务人员开始进行心肺复苏到首次除颤的时间(电击治疗时间)会影响这些预后。
我们分析了569,937例最初心律不可电击复律的OHCA成年患者的数据。这些数据是在2005年至2010年期间从一个全国性的日本Utstein式数据库中收集的。患者被分为后续接受电击治疗组(n = 21,944)和后续未接受电击治疗组(n = 547,993)。主要研究终点是1个月时良好的神经学预后(脑功能分类量表,1级或2级)。
在后续接受电击治疗组中,1个月时良好神经学预后的比例显著高于后续未接受电击治疗组(1.79%对0.60%,P < 0.001)。对11个院前变量进行多变量逻辑回归分析显示,当电击治疗时间小于20分钟时,后续电击治疗与1个月时良好神经学预后的几率增加显著相关(调整后的优势比(95%置信区间),电击治疗时间小于10分钟时为6.55(5.21至8.22),10至19分钟时为2.97(2.58至3.43))。然而,当电击治疗时间大于或等于20分钟时,后续电击治疗与1个月时良好神经学预后的几率增加无关。
在OHCA后最初心律不可电击复律的患者中,当电击治疗时间小于20分钟时,紧急医疗服务复苏过程中随后转变为可电击复律与1个月时良好神经学预后的几率增加相关。