Service de Neurochirurgie, CHU de Nice, France,
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Dec;155(12):2399-402. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1870-2. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
While a significant body of literature exists on the intracranial part of deep brain stimulation surgery, the equally important second part of the intervention related to the subcutaneous tunneling of deep brain stimulation extension wires is rarely described. The tunneling strategy can consist of a single passage of the extension wires from the frontal incision site to the subclavicular area, or of a two-step approach that adds a retro-auricular counter-incision. Each technique harbors the risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications.
At our center, we perform a two-step tunneling procedure that we developed based on a cadaveric study.
In 125 consecutive patients operated since 2002, we did not encounter any complication related to our tunneling method.
Insufficient data exist to fully evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each tunneling technique. It is of critical importance that authors detail their tunneling modus operandi and report the presence or absence of complications. This gathered data pool may help to formulate a definitive conclusions on the safest method for subcutaneous tunneling of extension wires in deep brain stimulation.
尽管有大量关于脑深部刺激手术颅内部分的文献,但与脑深部刺激延伸线皮下隧道相关的同样重要的干预的第二部分却很少被描述。隧道策略可以包括从额部切口到锁骨下区域的延伸线的单次通过,或者是增加耳后反向切口的两步法。每种技术都有术中及术后并发症的风险。
在我们中心,我们根据尸体研究开发了一种两步式隧道技术。
自 2002 年以来,在 125 例连续手术患者中,我们没有遇到任何与我们的隧道方法相关的并发症。
目前还没有足够的数据来全面评估每种隧道技术的优缺点。作者详细说明他们的隧道操作方式并报告并发症的存在与否非常重要。这个收集的数据池可能有助于对脑深部刺激延伸线皮下隧道最安全的方法形成明确的结论。