Park Kang-Nam, Oh Seung-Min, Lee Chang-Youn, Kim Jwa-Young, Yang Byoung-Eun
From the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang City, South Korea.
J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(5):1801-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a21163.
A novel maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) procedure using a skeletal anchorage screw (SAS) (in the maxilla) and an arch bar (in the mandible), which we call "hybrid maxillomandibular fixation," was explored in this study. The aims of the study were to examine the efficacy of our hybrid MMF method and to compare periodontal tissue health and occlusal rehabilitation among 3 MMF methods.
In total, 112 patients who had undergone open reduction at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery between September 2005 and December 2012 were selected for this study. The participants were assigned to one of the following groups: SAS (maxilla), SAS (mandible), SAS-arch bar, or arch bar-arch bar. Periodontal health was evaluated using the Gingival Index, and the perioperative occlusal reproducibility was evaluated using a score of 1 to 3. Statistical analysis was performed using parametric tests (Student t test or 1-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc Tukey test).
In the Gingival Index comparison performed 1 month after the surgery, only the group using the arch bars and wiring was significantly different from the other groups (P < 0.05). The occlusal reproducibility scores were not significantly different. The pain and discomfort of the patients were reduced in the hybrid MMF group.
The hybrid MMF takes advantage of MMF using both arch bars and SASs for mandibular fractures. In addition, it overcomes many problems presented by previous MMF methods.
本研究探索了一种新型的颌间固定(MMF)方法,该方法使用骨锚固螺钉(SAS)(在上颌骨)和牙弓夹板(在下颌骨),我们称其为“混合颌间固定”。本研究的目的是检验我们的混合MMF方法的疗效,并比较三种MMF方法在牙周组织健康和咬合重建方面的差异。
本研究共选取了2005年9月至2012年12月期间在口腔颌面外科接受切开复位手术的112例患者。参与者被分配到以下组之一:SAS(上颌骨)组、SAS(下颌骨)组、SAS-牙弓夹板组或牙弓夹板-牙弓夹板组。使用牙龈指数评估牙周健康状况,并使用1至3分的评分评估围手术期咬合再现性。使用参数检验(Student t检验或单因素方差分析,随后进行事后Tukey检验)进行统计分析。
在术后1个月进行的牙龈指数比较中,只有使用牙弓夹板和结扎丝的组与其他组有显著差异(P < 0.05)。咬合再现性评分无显著差异。混合MMF组患者的疼痛和不适减轻。
混合MMF利用牙弓夹板和SAS对下颌骨骨折进行颌间固定。此外,它克服了以往MMF方法存在的许多问题。