Caviness John N
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 East Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA,
Neurotherapeutics. 2014 Jan;11(1):188-200. doi: 10.1007/s13311-013-0216-3.
Myoclonus creates significant disability for patients. This symptom or sign can have many different etiologies, presentations, and pathophysiological mechanisms. A thorough evaluation for the myoclonus etiology is critical for developing a treatment strategy. The best etiological classification scheme is a modified version from that proposed by Marsden et al. in 1982. Clinical neurophysiology, as assessed by electromyography and electroencephalography, can be used to classify the pathophysiology of the myoclonus using a neurophysiology classification scheme. If the etiology of the myoclonus cannot be reversed or treated, then symptomatic treatment of the myoclonus itself may be warranted. Unfortunately, there are few controlled studies for myoclonus treatments. The treatment strategy for the myoclonus is best derived from the neurophysiology classification scheme categories: 1) cortical, 2) cortical-subcortical, 3) subcortical-nonsegmental, 4) segmental, and 5) peripheral. A cortical physiology classification is most common. Levetiracetam is suggested as first-line treatment for cortical myoclonus, but valproic acid and clonazepam are commonly used. Cortical-subcortical myoclonus is the physiology demonstrated by myoclonic seizures, such as in primary epileptic myoclonus (e.g., juvenile myoclonic epilepsy). Valproic acid has demonstrated efficacy in such epileptic syndromes with other medications providing an adjunctive role. Clonazepam is used for subcortical-nonsegmental myoclonus, but other treatments, depending on the syndrome, have been used for this physiological type of myoclonus. Segmental myoclonus is difficult to treat, but clonazepam and botulinum toxin are used. Botulinum toxin is used for focal examples of peripheral myoclonus. Myoclonus treatment is commonly not effective and/or limited by side effects.
肌阵挛给患者带来了严重的功能障碍。这种症状或体征可能有许多不同的病因、表现和病理生理机制。对肌阵挛病因进行全面评估对于制定治疗策略至关重要。最佳的病因分类方案是对Marsden等人在1982年提出的方案进行修改后的版本。通过肌电图和脑电图评估的临床神经生理学可用于使用神经生理学分类方案对肌阵挛的病理生理学进行分类。如果肌阵挛的病因无法逆转或治疗,那么可能有必要对肌阵挛本身进行对症治疗。不幸的是,针对肌阵挛治疗的对照研究很少。肌阵挛的治疗策略最好源自神经生理学分类方案的类别:1)皮质性,2)皮质-皮质下性,3)皮质下-非节段性,4)节段性,以及5)周围性。皮质生理学分类最为常见。左乙拉西坦被建议作为皮质性肌阵挛的一线治疗药物,但丙戊酸和氯硝西泮也常用。皮质-皮质下性肌阵挛是肌阵挛性发作所表现出的生理状态,例如在原发性癫痫性肌阵挛(如青少年肌阵挛性癫痫)中。丙戊酸已证明对这类癫痫综合征有效,其他药物起辅助作用。氯硝西泮用于皮质下-非节段性肌阵挛,但根据综合征的不同,也使用其他治疗方法来治疗这种生理类型的肌阵挛。节段性肌阵挛难以治疗,但使用氯硝西泮和肉毒杆菌毒素。肉毒杆菌毒素用于周围性肌阵挛的局部病例。肌阵挛的治疗通常无效和/或受副作用限制。