Nilsson K M
Portland State University, Oregon 97207.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1990 Jan;38(1):17-24. doi: 10.1080/00207149008414495.
This study explored how the expectation of hypnosis and the expectation of relaxation affected the vividness of visual imagery. 63 Ss who volunteered for a visual imagination study were randomly assigned to 4 groups. Ss were administered the vividness subscale (VS) of the Vividness and Control of Imagery Scale twice. In the 3 experimental groups, expectations were varied during the 2 VS administrations. All 3 groups were presented with a relaxation exercise between VS administrations. In 2 groups, it was labeled "hypnosis," and in the third group it was correctly labeled "relaxation." A control group listened to a neutral tape between their VSs. All groups were administered the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (Shor & E. C. Orne, 1962) after the 2 imagery tests. The results indicated that the vividness of visual imagery was significantly enhanced (equally) in the experimental groups but not in the control group.
本研究探讨了对催眠的期望和对放松的期望如何影响视觉意象的生动程度。63名自愿参加视觉想象研究的受试者被随机分为4组。受试者两次接受意象生动性与控制量表的生动性子量表(VS)测试。在3个实验组中,两次VS测试期间期望有所不同。所有3个组在两次VS测试之间都进行了一次放松练习。在2个组中,该练习被标记为“催眠”,在第三组中被正确标记为“放松”。一个对照组在两次VS测试之间听一段中性的录音带。在两次意象测试后,所有组都接受了哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A型(肖尔和E.C.奥恩,1962年)测试。结果表明,实验组中视觉意象的生动程度显著提高(程度相同),而对照组则未提高。