Suppr超能文献

同胞配置预测个体和后代在现代后工业社会中的社会经济成功。

Sibling configuration predicts individual and descendant socioeconomic success in a modern post-industrial society.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 6;8(9):e73698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073698. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Growing up with many siblings, at least in the context of modern post-industrial low fertility, low mortality societies, is predictive of relatively poor performance on school tests in childhood, lower levels of educational attainment, and lower income throughout adulthood. Recent studies further indicate these relationships hold across generations, so that the descendants of those who grow up with many siblings are also at an apparent socioeconomic disadvantage. In this paper we add to this literature by considering whether such relationships interact with the sex and relative age of siblings. To do this we utilise a unique Swedish multigenerational birth cohort study that provides sibling configuration data on over 10,000 individuals born in 1915-1929, plus all their direct genetic descendants to the present day. Adjusting for parental and birth characteristics, we find that the 'socioeconomic cost' of growing up in a large family is independent of both the sex of siblings and the sex of the individual. However, growing up with several older as opposed to several younger siblings is predictive of relatively poor performance on school tests and a lower likelihood of progression to tertiary education. This later-born disadvantage also holds across generations, with the children of those with many older siblings achieving lower levels of educational attainment. Despite these differences, we find that while individual and descendant income is negatively related to the number of siblings, it is not influenced by the relative age of siblings. Thus, our findings imply that the educational disadvantage of later-born children, demonstrated here and in numerous other studies, does not necessarily translate into reduced earnings in adulthood. We discuss potential explanations for this pattern of results, and consider some important directions for future research into sibling configuration and wellbeing in modern societies.

摘要

在现代后工业化、低生育率、低死亡率的社会中,与许多兄弟姐妹一起长大,预测会在儿童时期的学校考试中表现相对较差,受教育程度较低,成年后的收入也较低。最近的研究进一步表明,这些关系在代际之间是存在的,因此,那些与许多兄弟姐妹一起长大的人的后代在社会经济方面也明显处于劣势。在本文中,我们通过考虑这些关系是否与兄弟姐妹的性别和相对年龄有关,进一步探讨了这一文献。为此,我们利用了一项独特的瑞典多代出生队列研究,该研究提供了 1915 年至 1929 年期间出生的 10000 多人以及他们至今所有直系遗传后代的兄弟姐妹配置数据。在调整了父母和出生特征后,我们发现,在大家庭中成长的“社会经济成本”与兄弟姐妹的性别以及个体的性别无关。然而,与有几个年龄较大的兄弟姐妹相比,与几个年龄较小的兄弟姐妹一起长大,会预测在学校考试中表现相对较差,并且不太可能进入高等教育。这种后来出生的劣势也在代际之间存在,那些有许多年龄较大的兄弟姐妹的孩子受教育程度较低。尽管存在这些差异,我们发现,虽然个人和后代的收入与兄弟姐妹的数量呈负相关,但不受兄弟姐妹相对年龄的影响。因此,我们的研究结果表明,这里和许多其他研究中表明的后来出生的孩子的教育劣势,并不一定转化为成年后收入减少。我们讨论了这种结果模式的潜在解释,并考虑了未来关于现代社会中兄弟姐妹配置和幸福感的研究的一些重要方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa32/3765256/de5b4b219a02/pone.0073698.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Sibling configuration predicts individual and descendant socioeconomic success in a modern post-industrial society.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 6;8(9):e73698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073698. eCollection 2013.
2
New Partner, New Order? Multipartnered Fertility and Birth Order Effects on Educational Achievement.
Demography. 2020 Oct;57(5):1625-1646. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00905-4.
3
Sibling configuration and childhood growth in contemporary British families.
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;37(6):1408-21. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn116. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
4
Sibling Similarity in Education Across and Within Societies.
Demography. 2021 Jun 1;58(3):1011-1037. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9164021.
6
The declining influence of family background on educational attainment in Australia: The role of measured and unmeasured influences.
Soc Sci Res. 2016 Jan;55:171-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
8
Family Matters: Siblings and High School Graduation.
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2017 Oct 10;2(1):407. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v2i1.407.

引用本文的文献

1
Early-life social and health determinants of adult socioeconomic position: associations and trends across generations.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 May;74(5):412-420. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213209. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
2
Morphometric traits predict educational attainment independently of socioeconomic background.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;19(1):1696. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8072-7.
3
Fewer Siblings, More Wealth? Sibship Size and Wealth Attainment.
Eur J Popul. 2019 Jan 17;35(5):959-986. doi: 10.1007/s10680-018-09512-x. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Differences between sons and daughters in the intergenerational transmission of wealth.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 2;374(1780):20180076. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0076. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
6
Parental Resources, Sibship Size, and Educational Performance in 20 Countries: Evidence for the Compensation Model.
Cross Cult Res. 2016 Dec;50(5):452-477. doi: 10.1177/1069397116671139. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
7
Why did children grow so well at hard times? The ultimate importance of pathogen control during puberty.
Evol Med Public Health. 2015 Jul 21;2015(1):167-78. doi: 10.1093/emph/eov017.

本文引用的文献

1
Brothers and sisters : How sibling interactions affect optimal parental allocations.
Hum Nat. 1998 Jun;9(2):119-61. doi: 10.1007/s12110-998-1001-6.
3
Birth order progressively affects childhood height.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013 Sep;79(3):379-85. doi: 10.1111/cen.12156. Epub 2013 May 11.
4
Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern post-industrial society.
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 7;279(1746):4342-51. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1415. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
5
Land inheritance establishes sibling competition for marriage and reproduction in rural Ethiopia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 8;108(6):2200-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010241108. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
6
Parental investment and the optimization of human family size.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):333-43. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0297.
7
Siblings and childhood mental health: evidence for a later-born advantage.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(12):2061-2069. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
8
Optimizing Modern Family Size: Trade-offs between Fertility and the Economic Costs of Reproduction.
Hum Nat. 2010 Mar;21(1):39-61. doi: 10.1007/s12110-010-9080-6. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
9
Childhood circumstances and anthropometry: the Boyd Orr cohort.
Ann Hum Biol. 2008 Sep-Oct;35(5):518-34. doi: 10.1080/03014460802294250.
10
Sibling configuration and childhood growth in contemporary British families.
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;37(6):1408-21. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn116. Epub 2008 Jun 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验