Baryza Mary Jo, Hinson Michelle, Conway Jennifer, Ryan Colleen M
From *Patient Care Services and †Acute Surgery Service, Shriners Hospitals for Children®-Boston, Massachusetts; and ‡Division of Burns, Department of Surgery, Sumner Redstone Burn Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
J Burn Care Res. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):607-11. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182a2a887.
Burns from contact with glass doors of gas fireplaces have been previously reported. The purpose of this study is to examine the incidence and severity of this injury in our population. Patients were identified for inclusion in the retrospective chart review study using the National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons (NTRACS) and our local outpatient database. Criteria for inclusion were burn injuries sustained from contact with fireplace glass doors treated at our pediatric burn center from 2007 through 2011. Fifty children met these criteria, including two children whose burns were caused by electric fireplace glass doors. BSA burned was 1.5 ± 1.5% (mean ± SD), range 0.5 to 10%. Age was 27.2 ± 27.3 months, range 8 months to 13 years. Forty-five children (90%) had hand burns; of these, 18 children had bilateral hand involvement. Facial burns were found in three children (6%), and eight children (16%) had other areas burned. One patient developed cellulitis. Two patients required surgery. Six children (12%) required hospitalization; mean length of stay was 5.8 ± 5 days, range 1 to 5 days. Although the number of inpatient admissions was relatively few, 329 outpatient visits and 309 rehabilitation visits were required for treatment of these children. Nineteen patients (38%) required splints and six patients (12%) required scar treatment with pressure garments. Burns from contact with fireplace glass doors are a recurring problem. Toddlers are most at risk. Directed preventive strategies including parent education, safety warnings, and design modifications such as temperature sensors and barrier screens could be potentially helpful in reducing the incidence of this injury.
此前已有关于接触燃气壁炉玻璃门导致烧伤的报道。本研究的目的是调查我们人群中这种损伤的发生率和严重程度。通过美国外科医师学会国家创伤登记处(NTRACS)和我们当地的门诊数据库,确定患者纳入回顾性图表审查研究。纳入标准为2007年至2011年在我们儿科烧伤中心接受治疗的因接触壁炉玻璃门而导致的烧伤。50名儿童符合这些标准,其中两名儿童的烧伤是由电壁炉玻璃门引起的。烧伤面积为1.5±1.5%(均值±标准差),范围为0.5%至10%。年龄为27.2±27.3个月,范围为8个月至13岁。45名儿童(90%)手部烧伤;其中18名儿童双侧手部受累。3名儿童(6%)面部烧伤,8名儿童(16%)其他部位烧伤。1名患者发生蜂窝织炎。2名患者需要手术。6名儿童(12%)需要住院治疗;平均住院时间为5.8±5天,范围为1至5天。尽管住院人数相对较少,但这些儿童的治疗需要329次门诊就诊和309次康复就诊。19名患者(38%)需要夹板,6名患者(12%)需要使用压力衣进行瘢痕治疗。接触壁炉玻璃门导致的烧伤是一个反复出现的问题。幼儿风险最高。包括家长教育、安全警告以及诸如温度传感器和屏障屏风等设计改进在内的针对性预防策略可能有助于降低这种损伤的发生率。