Rieman Mary T, Neely Alice N, Boyce Steven T, Kossenjans William J, Durkee Paula J, Zembrodt Jacquelyn M, Puthoff Barbara K, Kagan Richard J
From the Departments of *Clinical Research, †Microbiology, and ‡Tissue Engineering, and §Medical Staff, Shriners Hospitals for Children-Cincinnati, Ohio; and ‖Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio.
J Burn Care Res. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):e217-23. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182a23228.
Amish burn wound ointment (ABO) contains honey, lanolin, oils, glycerin, bees wax, and other natural additives. Although there are many anecdotal reports that this ointment covered with a burdock leaf (BL) dressing promotes burn wound healing, little scientific testing of this treatment has occurred. The goal of this study was to evaluate in vitro some of the components of this treatment modality for antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities. The ABO was tested for sterility using standard microbiological techniques. Because of the semisolid, lipid-based nature of the salve, the at-use product could not be tested in bioassays. Samples of BL and the dry ingredients (DI) used in the ointment were provided by the Amish vendor. Aqueous extracts of the DI and of the BL were prepared and freeze dried. The freeze-dried extracts were reconstituted, filtered, and tested separately on keratinocyte and fibroblast cell cultures for cytotoxicity (growth inhibition assay) and against a panel of susceptible and resistant microbes for antimicrobial activity (Nathan's agar-well diffusion assay) in a series of concentrations (% wt/vol). Neither DI nor BL extracts demonstrated antimicrobial activity against any of organisms tested. The DI extract inhibited growth of both keratinocytes and fibroblasts at the 0.1% concentration. The 0.1 and 0.03% concentrations of the BL extract were cytotoxic to both keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Although tests for microbial growth from the at-use preparation of the ABO were negative, extracts of the DI and BL did not demonstrate any antimicrobial activity. Additionally, both extracts inhibited the growth of skin cells in vitro at higher concentrations. These results suggest caution in the use of ABO and BL dressings if there is more than a minimal risk of complications from the burn injury.
阿米什烧伤伤口软膏(ABO)含有蜂蜜、羊毛脂、油类、甘油、蜂蜡和其他天然添加剂。尽管有许多轶事报道称,这种覆盖有牛蒡叶(BL)敷料的软膏可促进烧伤伤口愈合,但对这种治疗方法的科学测试却很少。本研究的目的是在体外评估这种治疗方式的一些成分的抗菌和细胞毒性活性。使用标准微生物技术对ABO进行无菌测试。由于该药膏具有半固体、脂质基的性质,使用中的产品无法在生物测定中进行测试。BL和用于该软膏的干成分(DI)的样品由阿米什供应商提供。制备DI和BL的水提取物并冻干。将冻干提取物复溶后过滤,并分别在角质形成细胞和成纤维细胞培养物上进行细胞毒性测试(生长抑制试验),并在一系列浓度(%重量/体积)下针对一组敏感和耐药微生物进行抗菌活性测试(内森琼脂孔扩散试验)。DI和BL提取物对所测试的任何生物体均未表现出抗菌活性。DI提取物在0.1%浓度下抑制角质形成细胞和成纤维细胞的生长。BL提取物的0.1%和0.03%浓度对角质形成细胞和成纤维细胞均具有细胞毒性。尽管对ABO使用制剂的微生物生长测试结果为阴性,但DI和BL提取物均未表现出任何抗菌活性。此外,两种提取物在较高浓度下均能在体外抑制皮肤细胞的生长。这些结果表明,如果烧伤损伤引起并发症的风险超过最小限度,在使用ABO和BL敷料时应谨慎。