*School of Human Movement Studies †Minerals Industry Safety and Health Centre, and ‡Schools of Human Movement Studies and Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 1;38(25):2208-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000013.
Prospective cohort study.
To determine if a job-specific pre-employment functional assessment (PEFA) predicts musculoskeletal injury risk in healthy mineworkers.
Traditional methods of pre-employment screening, including radiography and medical screenings, are not valid predictors of occupational musculoskeletal injury risk. Short-form job-specific functional capacity evaluations are increasing in popularity, despite limited evidence of their ability to predict injury risk in healthy workers.
Participants were recruited from an Australian coal mine between 2002 and 2009 as part of the hiring process. At baseline, participants were screened with the JobFit System PEFA, and classified as PEFA 1 if they met job demands and PEFA>1, if not. Males who completed the PEFA and were employed were included. Injury data from company records were coded for body part, mechanism, and severity. The relationship between PEFA classification and time to first injury was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustments for department and post hoc stratification for time (0-1.3 yr, 1.3-6 yr).
Of the 600 participants (median age, 37 yr, range, 17.0-62.6 yr), 427 scored PEFA 1. One hundred ninety-six sprain/strain injuries were reported by 121 workers, including 35 back injuries from manual handling. Significant differences between PEFA groups were found in time to first injury for all injury types during the long term (any injury: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4-3.9; manual handling injury: HR = 3.3, CI = 1.6-7.2; any back injury: HR = 3.3, CI = 1.6-6.6; back injuries from manual handling HR = 5.8, CI = 2.0-16.7), but not during the short term. An area under the receiver operator curve value of 0.73 (CI = 0.61-0.86) demonstrated acceptable predictive ability for back injuries from manual handling during the long term.
JobFit System PEFAs predict musculoskeletal injury risk in healthy mineworkers after 1.3 years of employment. Future research should assess whether use of these assessments as part of a holistic risk management program can decrease workplace musculoskeletal injuries.
前瞻性队列研究。
确定特定工作的入职前功能评估(PEFA)是否可预测健康矿工的肌肉骨骼损伤风险。
传统的入职前筛查方法,包括放射学和医学筛查,并不能有效预测职业性肌肉骨骼损伤的风险。简短的特定工作的功能性能力评估越来越受欢迎,尽管它们在预测健康工人的受伤风险方面的能力证据有限。
参与者于 2002 年至 2009 年期间作为招聘过程的一部分从澳大利亚的一家煤矿招募。在基线时,参与者接受了 JobFit 系统的 PEFA 筛查,如果他们符合工作要求并且 PEFA>1,则将他们分类为 PEFA 1,如果不符合则分类为 PEFA>1。完成 PEFA 并受雇的男性被纳入研究。从公司记录中对身体部位、机制和严重程度进行编码,受伤数据。使用 Cox 比例风险回归分析,调整部门和事后分层分析(0-1.3 年,1.3-6 年),分析 PEFA 分类与首次受伤时间之间的关系。
在 600 名参与者中(中位数年龄 37 岁,范围 17.0-62.6 岁),427 名参与者的 PEFA 评分为 1 分。121 名工人报告了 196 例扭伤/拉伤伤,其中 35 例为手动搬运导致的背部受伤。在长期(任何损伤:调整后的危险比[HR] = 2.3,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.4-3.9;手动搬运损伤:HR = 3.3,CI = 1.6-7.2;任何背部损伤:HR = 3.3,CI = 1.6-6.6;手动搬运引起的背部损伤 HR = 5.8,CI = 2.0-16.7)中,在所有损伤类型中,PEFA 组之间首次受伤时间存在显著差异,但在短期(任何损伤:HR = 1.4,CI = 0.9-2.2;手动搬运损伤:HR = 1.7,CI = 0.9-3.3;任何背部损伤:HR = 1.5,CI = 0.9-2.4;背部损伤 HR = 1.4,CI = 0.8-2.6)中未发现差异。接受者操作特征曲线下面积的 0.73(CI = 0.61-0.86)值表明,对长期(1.3 年)手动搬运引起的背部损伤具有可接受的预测能力。
JobFit 系统的 PEFA 可预测健康矿工在入职 1.3 年后的肌肉骨骼损伤风险。未来的研究应评估是否可以将这些评估作为整体风险管理计划的一部分,以减少工作场所肌肉骨骼损伤。