Suppr超能文献

一项关于二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂和磺脲类药物对二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者血糖变异性影响的比较研究。

A comparative study of the effects of a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor and sulfonylurea on glucose variability in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control on metformin.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Catholic University of Korea , Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Oct;15(10):810-6. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0038.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effects of sitagliptin on glycemic change and 24-h blood glucose variability with those of the sulfonylurea glimepiride.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A 4-week randomized double blind-labeled prospective design was used. We recruited 33 patients who had been treated with metformin for at least 2 months. Each participant prescribed with metformin was randomly assigned to either the sitagliptin (100 mg) or the glimepiride (2 mg) group. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was used to monitor glycemic changes for 3 successive days in both groups at baseline and at the 4-week follow-up. Glycemic changes and glucose variability were obtained using CGM, and these data were averaged over all subjects.

RESULTS

The comparison of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) between baseline and the 4-week follow-up showed that HbA1c was significantly reduced in the sitagliptin group (7.0 ± 0.5% to 6.6 ± 0.4%, P<0.001) and the glimepiride group (7.3 ± 0.4% to 6.9 ± 0.4%, P<0.001). The sitagliptin and glimepiride groups had similar HbA1c levels after 4 weeks, and there were no significant differences between the two groups. The mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) decreased significantly in the sitagliptin group (4.9 ± 1.0 to 3.7 ± 0.9 mmol/L, P<0.001), but no significant difference was observed in the glimepiride group (5.7 ± 1.5 to 5.0 ± 1.4 mmol/L, P=0.175). The SD and oxidative stress markers did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When sitagliptin was combined with metformin, the patients showed much more efficient blood glucose controlling effects, not only the three indexes of fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, and glycated hemoglobin, but also MAGE.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较西他列汀对血糖变化的影响与磺酰脲类格列美脲的影响。

受试者和方法

采用 4 周随机双盲前瞻性设计。我们招募了 33 名至少接受二甲双胍治疗 2 个月的患者。每位接受二甲双胍治疗的患者被随机分为西他列汀(100mg)或格列美脲(2mg)组。两组患者在基线和 4 周随访时均使用连续血糖监测(CGM)连续监测 3 天的血糖变化。使用 CGM 获得血糖变化和葡萄糖变异性,并对所有受试者的这些数据进行平均。

结果

与基线相比,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的比较显示,西他列汀组(7.0±0.5%至 6.6±0.4%,P<0.001)和格列美脲组(7.3±0.4%至 6.9±0.4%,P<0.001)的 HbA1c 显著降低。4 周后,西他列汀组和格列美脲组的 HbA1c 水平相似,两组间无显著差异。西他列汀组的平均血糖波动幅度(MAGE)显著降低(4.9±1.0 至 3.7±0.9mmol/L,P<0.001),而格列美脲组无显著差异(5.7±1.5 至 5.0±1.4mmol/L,P=0.175)。两组的 SD 和氧化应激标志物无显著差异。

结论

当西他列汀与二甲双胍联合使用时,患者表现出更有效的血糖控制效果,不仅空腹血糖、餐后血糖和糖化血红蛋白这三个指标,而且 MAGE 也有显著改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验