Department of Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College and Maharaja Yashwant Rao Hospital, Indore, India.
BJU Int. 2014 Jan;113(1):120-6. doi: 10.1111/bju.12361.
To determine the overall efficacy and predictors of success of the penile preputial flap in the management of complex urethral strictures >2.5 cm in length.
We performed a retrospective and prospective study of 58 patients undergoing single-stage penile preputial flap urethroplasty for complex long-segment urethral strictures, without lichen sclerosus, repaired between May 2005 and April 2012 at our institution. For obvious reasons circumcised patients were excluded from the study. Results were assessed by univariate analysis of various patient characteristics, preoperative and postoperative patient satisfaction (based on symptoms), and urethral ultrasonography, retrograde urethrography and uroflowmetry.
The median (range) follow-up was 42 (6-90) months, the median (range) intra-operative stricture length was 48.5 (26-85) mm and the median (range) operating time was 90 (85-125) min. A total of 87.93% of patients had a satisfactory outcome, with an overall success rate of 81.03%. Diabetes mellitus (relative risk [RR] 5.21, confidence interval [CI] 2.31-64.68, P = 0.003) and smoking (RR 4.19, CI 1.54- 45.0, P = 0.01) were predictors of failure, while postinfective aetiology (RR 2.19), panurethral stricture (RR 2.73), stricture length >70 mm (RR 3.25), previous urethroplasty (RR 2.4) and severe peri-urethral fibrosis (RR 2.37) were also associated with a higher risk of failure.
A urologist should try to gain experience of all the methods of urethroplasty as the techniques may vary according to the circumstances. Single-stage preputial skin flap urethroplasty, in experienced and expert hands, has results equivalent to all other methods of urethroplasty in complex urethral strictures. We prefer this technique in this part of the world where buccal mucosa cannot be used because of dyskeratotic changes as a result of consumption of gutkha, tobacco, pan masala, betel nut.
探讨应用阴茎包皮瓣治疗>2.5cm 长的复杂尿道狭窄的整体疗效和成功预测因子。
我们对 2005 年 5 月至 2012 年 4 月在我院接受一期阴茎包皮瓣尿道成形术治疗复杂长段尿道狭窄(无硬化性苔藓)的 58 例患者进行了回顾性和前瞻性研究。由于明显的原因,我们排除了接受过包皮环切术的患者。通过对各种患者特征、术前和术后患者满意度(基于症状)以及尿道超声、逆行尿道造影和尿流率的单因素分析来评估结果。
中位(范围)随访时间为 42(6-90)个月,术中狭窄长度的中位数(范围)为 48.5(26-85)mm,手术时间的中位数(范围)为 90(85-125)min。87.93%的患者有满意的结果,总成功率为 81.03%。糖尿病(相对风险[RR]5.21,置信区间[CI]2.31-64.68,P=0.003)和吸烟(RR 4.19,CI 1.54-45.0,P=0.01)是失败的预测因子,而感染后病因(RR 2.19)、全尿道狭窄(RR 2.73)、狭窄长度>70mm(RR 3.25)、既往尿道成形术(RR 2.4)和严重尿道周围纤维化(RR 2.37)与更高的失败风险相关。
泌尿科医生应尝试获得所有尿道成形术技术的经验,因为技术可能因情况而异。在有经验和专家的手中,一期包皮皮瓣尿道成形术的结果与复杂尿道狭窄的所有其他尿道成形术方法相当。在这个世界的这一部分,由于咀嚼 Gutka、烟草、潘马沙拉、槟榔导致的角化不良变化,无法使用颊黏膜,我们更喜欢这种技术。