Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Nov;28(11):643-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
Speciation by divergent natural selection is well supported. However, the role of sexual selection in speciation is less well understood due to disagreement about whether sexual selection is a mechanism of evolution separate from natural selection, as well as confusion about various models and tests of sexual selection. Here, we outline how sexual selection and natural selection are different mechanisms of evolutionary change, and suggest that this distinction is critical when analyzing the role of sexual selection in speciation. Furthermore, we clarify models of sexual selection with respect to their interaction with ecology and natural selection. In doing so, we outline a research agenda for testing hypotheses about the relative significance of divergent sexual and natural selection in the evolution of reproductive isolation.
物种形成的分歧性自然选择得到了很好的支持。然而,由于对性选择是否是一种与自然选择不同的进化机制存在分歧,以及对各种性选择模型和测试的混淆,性选择在物种形成中的作用还不太为人理解。在这里,我们概述了性选择和自然选择是如何成为进化变化的不同机制的,并建议在分析性选择在物种形成中的作用时,这种区别是至关重要的。此外,我们还澄清了性选择模型,以说明它们与生态学和自然选择的相互作用。通过这样做,我们概述了一个研究议程,用于测试关于分歧性的性选择和自然选择在生殖隔离进化中的相对重要性的假设。