Sawyer Nicola, Blennerhassett John, Lambert Ramon, Sheehan Paul, Vasikaran Samuel D
PathWest, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
PathWest, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Ann Clin Biochem. 2014 Jul;51(Pt 4):476-84. doi: 10.1177/0004563213499737. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
False-positive cardiac troponin (Tn) results caused by outliers have been reported on various analytical platforms. We have compared the precision profile and outlier rate of the Abbott Diagnostics contemporary troponin I (TnI) assay with their high sensitivity (hs) TnI assay.
Three studies were conducted over a 10-month period using routine patients' samples. TnI was measured in duplicate using the contemporary TnI assay in Study 1 and Study 2 (n = 7011 and 7089) and the hs-TnI assay in Study 3 (n = 1522). Critical outliers were defined as duplicate results whose absolute difference exceeded a critical difference (CD = z x √2 x SDAnalytical) at a probability level of 0.0005, with one of the results on the opposite side of the decision limit to its partner.
The TnI concentration at 10% imprecision (coefficient of variation) for the contemporary TnI assay was 0.034 µg/L (Study 1) and 0.042 µg/L (Study 2), and 0.006 µg/L (6 ng/L) for the hs-TnI assay. The critical outlier rates for the contemporary TnI assay were 0.51% (Study 1) and 0.37% (Study 2) using a cut-off of 0.04 µg/L, and 0% for the hs-TnI assay using gender-specific cut-offs.
The significant number of critical outliers detected using the contemporary TnI assay may pose a risk for misclassification of patients. By contrast, no critical outliers were detected using the hs-TnI assay. However, the total outlier rates for both assays were significantly higher than the expected variability of either assay. The cause of these outliers remains unclear.
在各种分析平台上均有因离群值导致心肌肌钙蛋白(Tn)结果出现假阳性的报道。我们比较了雅培诊断公司的当代肌钙蛋白I(TnI)检测方法与其高敏(hs)TnI检测方法的精密度曲线和离群值率。
在10个月期间使用常规患者样本进行了三项研究。在研究1和研究2(n = 7011和7089)中使用当代TnI检测方法对TnI进行双份测定,在研究3(n = 1522)中使用hs-TnI检测方法。临界离群值定义为双份结果,其绝对差值在概率水平为0.0005时超过临界差值(CD = z×√2×SDAnalytical),且其中一个结果位于决策限与其对应结果的相反侧。
当代TnI检测方法在10%不精密度(变异系数)时的TnI浓度在研究1中为0.034μg/L,在研究2中为0.042μg/L,而hs-TnI检测方法为0.006μg/L(6ng/L)。当代TnI检测方法在截断值为0.04μg/L时的临界离群值率在研究1中为0.51%,在研究2中为0.37%,而hs-TnI检测方法使用性别特异性截断值时为0%。
使用当代TnI检测方法检测到的大量临界离群值可能会给患者分类错误带来风险。相比之下,使用hs-TnI检测方法未检测到临界离群值。然而,两种检测方法的总离群值率均显著高于任何一种检测方法预期的变异性。这些离群值的原因尚不清楚。