a Center of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences , University of Porto , Porto , Portugal.
J Homosex. 2013;60(10):1475-93. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2013.819221.
This article analyzes how heteronormative discourse may be (re)produced by the very same people it serves to oppress, binding heteronormativity to a specific form of homonormativity. Furthermore, this article also links Portuguese history and society by discussing the context and the recent legal changes that led to legislation providing for same-sex marriage. Using thematic analysis of 14 interviews, this article demonstrates how heteronorms are upheld in the discourses of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBQ) participants. Themes linked to public displays of affection and discrimination emerged from the interviews. Participant discourses are analyzed in terms of their incorporation of heteronorms. Homonormativity is present in both the themes subject to analysis. Analysis of the interviews shows how transgressing the heteronorm implies costs and is ultimately perceived as a personal risk. This article concludes that the lack of discursive resistance denies the possibility of re-signification and subversion even in LGBQ discourses. This clearly indicates the pervasiveness of discourses reiterating heteronorms, even those issued by those most oppressed by such norms.
这篇文章分析了异性恋规范话语如何(重新)被压迫他们的人所产生,将异性恋规范与特定形式的同性恋规范联系起来。此外,本文还通过讨论导致立法规定同性婚姻的背景和最近的法律变化,将葡萄牙的历史和社会联系起来。本文通过对 14 次访谈的主题分析,展示了同性恋、双性恋、双性恋和酷儿(LGBQ)参与者的话语如何维护异性恋规范。访谈中出现了与公开表达感情和歧视有关的主题。从他们纳入异性恋规范的角度分析参与者的话语。同性恋规范在分析的主题中都存在。对访谈的分析表明,违反异性恋规范意味着成本,最终被视为个人风险。本文得出的结论是,缺乏话语上的抵制否认了重新赋予意义和颠覆的可能性,即使在 LGBQ 话语中也是如此。这清楚地表明,即使是那些受这种规范压迫最深的人,也在反复重申异性恋规范的话语。