Suppr超能文献

低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤的减瘤腹腔镜手术和腹腔内热灌注化疗:早期结果和技术。

Risk-reducing laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: early outcomes and technique.

机构信息

Peritoneal Tumour Service, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):341-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3189-8. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is a precursor lesion of pseudomyxoma peritonei, which, if treated suboptimally, may later disseminate throughout the abdominal cavity. We previously demonstrated the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to reduce the dissemination risk. Here we describe the feasibility and safety of minimal access cytoreductive surgery (MACRS) and HIPEC as an alternative to the open approach.

METHODS

We evaluated patients with LAMNs at risk of dissemination (known as LAMN II) who were referred to a national treatment centre between 2010 and 2012 and comparison is made between this group and patients undergoing open CRS and HIPEC for the same pathology over the same time period.

RESULTS

Of the 39 patients with LAMN II, 10 patients were treated by MACRS and HIPEC and 7 were treated by an open approach. Among the MACRS procedures, there were no conversions to open surgery; median procedure length, median length of stay, and complication rates were similar between groups and there were no 30-day deaths. After 3- and 11-months median follow-up respectively, no patients have evidence of disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

The present series demonstrates that MACRS and HIPEC is a feasible and safe alternative to the open procedure with the advantage of smaller abdominal wounds and comparable morbidity and inpatient stay. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact on disease progression.

摘要

背景

低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤(LAMN)是腹膜假黏液瘤的前体病变,如果治疗不当,可能会在腹腔内扩散。我们之前已经证明了细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)在降低扩散风险方面的作用。在这里,我们描述了微创细胞减灭术(MACRS)和 HIPEC 的可行性和安全性,作为开放手术的替代方法。

方法

我们评估了 2010 年至 2012 年间在一个国家治疗中心就诊的有扩散风险的 LAMN 患者(称为 LAMN II),并将这些患者与同期接受开放 CRS 和 HIPEC 治疗的患者进行比较。

结果

在 39 例 LAMN II 患者中,有 10 例患者接受了 MACRS 和 HIPEC 治疗,7 例患者接受了开放手术治疗。在 MACRS 手术中,没有转为开放手术的病例;两组的中位手术时间、中位住院时间和并发症发生率相似,且无 30 天死亡病例。分别在术后 3 个月和 11 个月的中位随访时间,没有患者出现疾病进展的证据。

结论

本系列研究表明,MACRS 和 HIPEC 是一种可行且安全的开放手术替代方法,其优点是腹部创伤较小,且发病率和住院时间相似。需要更长的随访时间来评估对疾病进展的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验