Sugarbaker Paul H, Van der Speeten Kurt
1 Center for Gastrointestinal Malignancies, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA ; 2 Department of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Feb;7(1):29-44. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.105.
Although cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) have not been shown to be effective by themselves, as a combined treatment they are now standard of care for peritoneal metastases from appendiceal cancer and from colorectal cancer as well as peritoneal mesothelioma. The timing of the HIPEC in relation to the CRS is crucial in that the HIPEC is to destroy minimal residual disease that remains following the CRS and prevent microscopic tumor emboli within the abdomen and pelvis from implanting within the resection site, within fibrinous clot, or within blood clot. Proper selection of chemotherapy agents is crucial to the long-term benefit of CRS and HIPEC. One must consider the response expected with the cancer chemotherapy agent, its area under the curve (AUC) ratio indicating the amount of dose intensity within the peritoneal space, and the drug retention within the peritoneal space for a prolonged exposure. Hyperthermia will augment the cytotoxicity of the cancer chemotherapy agents and improve drug penetration. Irrigation techniques should not be overlooked as an important means of reducing the cancer cell burden within the abdomen and pelvis. Multiple technologies for HIPEC exist and these have advantages and disadvantages. The techniques vary from a totally open technique with a vapor barrier over the open abdominal space to a totally closed technique whereby the HIPEC is administered at the completion of the surgical procedure. The open techniques depend on a table-mounted retractor for suspension of the skin edges allowing a reservoir to occur within the abdomen and pelvis. There are nearly a dozen commercially available hyperthermia pumps, all of which seem to perform adequately for HIPEC although there is a variable degree of convenience and documentation of the HIPEC procedure. As the management of peritoneal metastases has progressed over three decades, early cases are now seen in which a laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC may be appropriate. Also, prophylactic use of laparoscopic HIPEC with perforated appendiceal malignancies and T4 colon cancers may be appropriate.
尽管减瘤手术(CRS)和围手术期热灌注化疗(HIPEC)单独使用时并未显示出有效性,但作为联合治疗,它们现在是阑尾癌、结直肠癌以及腹膜间皮瘤腹膜转移的标准治疗方法。HIPEC与CRS的时间安排至关重要,因为HIPEC旨在破坏CRS后残留的微小病灶,并防止腹部和盆腔内的微小肿瘤栓子植入切除部位、纤维蛋白凝块或血凝块内。正确选择化疗药物对于CRS和HIPEC的长期疗效至关重要。必须考虑癌症化疗药物预期的反应、其曲线下面积(AUC)比值,该比值表明腹膜腔内的剂量强度,以及药物在腹膜腔内的保留时间以实现长时间暴露。热疗将增强癌症化疗药物的细胞毒性并改善药物渗透。冲洗技术作为减少腹部和盆腔内癌细胞负荷的重要手段不应被忽视。存在多种用于HIPEC的技术,这些技术各有优缺点。技术范围从在开放腹腔空间上方设有蒸汽屏障的完全开放技术到在手术过程完成时进行HIPEC的完全封闭技术。开放技术依赖于安装在手术台上的牵开器来悬吊皮肤边缘,从而在腹部和盆腔内形成一个储液池。有近十二种市售的热疗泵,尽管HIPEC程序的便利性和记录程度各不相同,但所有这些泵似乎都能充分用于HIPEC。随着腹膜转移的管理在过去三十年中不断发展,现在出现了一些早期病例,其中腹腔镜CRS和HIPEC可能是合适的。此外,对于穿孔性阑尾恶性肿瘤和T4期结肠癌预防性使用腹腔镜HIPEC可能是合适的。