Ali Syed Ahmed, Christy Jonathan M, Griesser Michael J, Awan Hisham, Pan Xueliang, Ellis Thomas J
1 OSU Sports Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio - USA.
Hip Int. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):5-13. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000076. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
We conducted a systematic review to determine whether the literature supports the use of free vascularised fibular graft (FVFG) over other salvage procedures for the treatment of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head, and if there are patient-specific and defect-specific factors that may predict better outcomes after FVFG. Fifteen total studies were identified for inclusion. Three comparative studies showed an overall statistically significant superiority of FVFG over NVFG; two comparative studies demonstrated FVFG better than core decompression. One study show a better but not statistically significant superiority of FVFG comparing with vascularised iliac pedicle bone graft procedures, likely due to small sample size. This review suggests that vascularised fibular grafting is a better treatment option than core decompression and nonvascularised fibular grafting.
我们进行了一项系统评价,以确定文献是否支持使用游离带血管腓骨移植术(FVFG)而非其他挽救手术来治疗股骨头缺血性坏死(AVN),以及是否存在患者特异性和缺损特异性因素可预测FVFG术后有更好的疗效。共确定了15项研究纳入分析。三项比较研究显示,FVFG在总体上比非血管化腓骨移植术(NVFG)具有统计学显著优势;两项比较研究表明FVFG优于髓芯减压术。一项研究显示,与带血管蒂髂骨移植术相比,FVFG有更好的效果,但未达到统计学显著优势,这可能是由于样本量较小。本评价表明,带血管腓骨移植术是比髓芯减压术和非血管化腓骨移植术更好的治疗选择。