Papageorgiou Spyridon N, Konstantinidis Ioannis, Papadopoulou Konstantina, Jäger Andreas, Bourauel Christoph
*Departments of Oral Technology and**Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, Germany,
***Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):350-63. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt064. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
Fixed-appliance treatment is a major part of orthodontic treatment, but clinical evidence remains scarce.
Objective of this systematic review was to investigate how the therapeutic effects and side-effects of brackets used during the fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment are affected by their characteristics. SEARCH METHODS AND SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched MEDLINE and 18 other databases through April 2012 without restrictions for randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials investigating any bracket characteristic.
After duplicate selection and extraction procedures, risk of bias was assessed also in duplicate according to Cochrane guidelines and quality of evidence according to the Grades of Recommendation. Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Random-effects meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses were performed with the corresponding 95 per cent confidence intervals (CI) and 95 per cent prediction intervals (PI).
We included 25 trials on 1321 patients, with most comparing self-ligated (SL) and conventional brackets. Based on the meta-analyses, the duration of orthodontic treatment was on average 2.01 months longer among patients with SL brackets (95 per cent CI: 0.45 to 3.57). The 95 per cent PIs for a future trial indicated that the difference could be considerable (-1.46 to 5.47 months). Treatment characteristics, outcomes, and side-effects were clinically similar between SL and conventional brackets. For most bracket characteristics, evidence is insufficient. Some meta-analyses included trials with high risk of bias, but sensitivity analyses indicated robustness.
Based on existing evidence, no clinical recommendation can be made regarding the bracket material or different ligation modules. For SL brackets, no conclusive benefits could be proven, while their use was associated with longer treatment durations.
固定矫治器治疗是正畸治疗的重要组成部分,但临床证据仍然匮乏。
本系统评价的目的是研究固定矫治器正畸治疗中使用的托槽的特性如何影响其治疗效果和副作用。
我们检索了截至2012年4月的MEDLINE及其他18个数据库,对研究任何托槽特性的随机对照试验和半随机对照试验均无限制。
经过重复筛选和提取程序后,根据Cochrane指南对偏倚风险进行了重复评估,并根据推荐分级、评估、制定与评价方法对证据质量进行了评估。采用相应的95%置信区间(CI)和95%预测区间(PI)进行随机效应荟萃分析、亚组分析和敏感性分析。
我们纳入了针对1321例患者的25项试验,大多数试验比较了自锁(SL)托槽和传统托槽。基于荟萃分析,使用SL托槽的患者正畸治疗时间平均长2.01个月(95%CI:0.45至3.57)。未来试验的95%PI表明差异可能相当大(-1.46至5.47个月)。SL托槽和传统托槽在治疗特性、结果和副作用方面在临床上相似。对于大多数托槽特性,证据不足。一些荟萃分析纳入了偏倚风险高的试验,但敏感性分析表明结果具有稳健性。
基于现有证据,无法就托槽材料或不同结扎方式给出临床推荐。对于SL托槽,无法证明其有确凿的益处,但其使用与更长的治疗时间相关。