Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstr. 11, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Division of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):1851-1868. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04931-5. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
To assess the pain profile of patients in the levelling/alignment phase of orthodontic treatment, as reported from randomized clinical trials.
Five databases were searched in September 2022 for randomized clinical trials assessing pain during levelling/alignment with a visual analogue scale (VAS). After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment, random effects meta-analyses of mean differences (MDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed, followed by subgroup/meta-regression, and certainty analyses.
A total of 37 randomized trials including 2277 patients (40.3% male; mean age 17.5 years) were identified. Data indicated quick pain initiation after insertion of orthodontic appliances (n = 6; average = 12.4 mm VAS), a quick increase to a peak at day 1 (n = 29; average = 42.4 mm), and gradually daily decrease the first week until its end (n = 23; average = 9.0 mm). Every second patient reported analgesic use at least once this week (n = 8; 54.5%), with peak analgesic use at 6 h post-insertion (n = 2; 62.3%). Patients reported reduced pain in the evening compared to morning (n = 3; MD = - 3.0 mm; 95%CI = - 5.3, - 0.6; P = 0.01) and increased pain during chewing (n = 2; MD = 19.2 mm; 95% CI = 7.9, 30.4; P < 0.001) or occlusion of the back teeth (n = 2; MD = 12.4 mm; 95% CI = 1.4, 23.4; P = 0.3), while non-consistent effects were seen for patient age, sex, irregularity, or analgesic use. Subgroup analyses indicated increased pain among extraction cases and during treatment of the lower (rather than the upper) arch, while certainty around estimates was moderate to high.
Evidence indicated a specific pain profile during orthodontic levelling/alignment, without signs of consistent patient-related influencing factors.
评估正畸治疗排齐/整平阶段患者的疼痛状况,依据为随机临床试验的报告。
2022 年 9 月,对评估使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量排齐/整平过程中疼痛的随机临床试验进行了五项数据库检索。在进行了重复研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估后,进行了均值差(MD)及其 95%置信区间(CI)的随机效应荟萃分析,随后进行了亚组/荟萃回归和确定性分析。
共确定了 37 项随机试验,涉及 2277 名患者(40.3%为男性;平均年龄 17.5 岁)。数据表明,正畸矫治器置入后疼痛迅速发作(n=6;平均 VAS 值为 12.4mm),第 1 天迅速达到高峰(n=29;平均 VAS 值为 42.4mm),并在第 1 周逐渐每天下降直至结束(n=23;平均 VAS 值为 9.0mm)。每周有一半以上(n=8;54.5%)的患者至少报告过一次使用镇痛药,高峰为置入后 6 小时(n=2;62.3%)。患者报告说晚上的疼痛比早上(n=3;MD=-3.0mm;95%CI=-5.3,-0.6;P=0.01)轻,咀嚼(n=2;MD=19.2mm;95%CI=7.9,30.4;P<0.001)或后牙咬合(n=2;MD=12.4mm;95%CI=1.4,23.4;P=0.3)时疼痛增加,而患者年龄、性别、不规则程度或镇痛药使用等因素对疼痛无一致影响。亚组分析表明,拔牙病例和下颌(而非上颌)弓治疗时疼痛增加,而对估计值的确定性为中等至高。
证据表明,正畸排齐/整平过程中存在特定的疼痛模式,不存在与患者相关的一致影响因素。