Bosco Francesca M, Capozzi Francesca, Colle Livia, Marostica Paolo, Tirassa Maurizio
Corresponding author:
Alcohol Alcohol. 2014 May-Jun;49(3):299-307. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agt148. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
The aim of the study was to investigate multidimensional Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities in subjects with alcohol use disorder (AUD).
A semi-structured interview and a set of brief stories were used to investigate different components of the participants' ToM, namely first- vs. third-person, egocentric vs. allocentric, first- vs. second-order ToM in 22 persons with AUD plus an equal number of healthy controls. Participants were administered the Theory of Mind Assessment Scale (Th.o.m.a.s., Bosco et al., 2009a) and the Strange Stories test ( Happé et al., 1999).
Persons with AUD performed worse than controls at all ToM dimensions. The patterns of differences between groups varied according to the Th.o.m.a.s. dimension investigated. In particular persons with AUD performed worse at third-person than at first-person ToM, and at the allocentric than at the egocentric perspective.
These findings support the hypothesis that the ability to understand and ascribe mental states is impaired in AUD. Future studies should focus on the relevance of the different ToM impairments as predictors of treatment outcome in alcoholism, and on the possibility that rehabilitative interventions may be diversified according to ToM assessment.
本研究旨在调查酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者的多维度心理理论(ToM)能力。
采用半结构化访谈和一组简短故事来调查参与者ToM的不同组成部分,即第一人称与第三人称、自我中心与异我中心、一阶与二阶ToM,共纳入22名AUD患者以及同等数量的健康对照者。对参与者进行心理理论评估量表(Th.o.m.a.s.,Bosco等人,2009年a)和奇怪故事测试(Happé等人,1999年)。
在所有ToM维度上,AUD患者的表现均比对照组差。两组之间的差异模式因所调查的Th.o.m.a.s.维度而异。特别是,AUD患者在第三人称ToM方面比第一人称ToM表现更差,在异我中心视角比自我中心视角表现更差。
这些发现支持了以下假设,即AUD患者理解和归因心理状态的能力受损。未来的研究应关注不同ToM损伤作为酒精中毒治疗结果预测指标的相关性,以及根据ToM评估使康复干预多样化的可能性。