Suppr超能文献

新一代药物洗脱支架治疗患者中支架重叠对长期临床结局的影响。

Impact of stent overlap on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with newer-generation drug-eluting stents.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2014 Jan 22;9(9):1076-84. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I9A182.

Abstract

AIMS

Early-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) overlap (OL) is associated with impaired long-term clinical outcomes whereas the impact of OL with newer-generation DES is unknown. Our aim was to assess the impact of OL on long-term clinical outcomes among patients treated with newer-generation DES.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed the three-year clinical outcomes of 3,133 patients included in a prospective DES registry according to stent type (sirolimus-eluting stents [SES; N=1,532] versus everolimus-eluting stents [EES; N=1,601]), and the presence or absence of OL. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularisation (TVR). The primary endpoint was more common in patients with OL (25.1%) than in those with multiple DES without OL (20.8%, adj HR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.03-2.09) and patients with a single DES (18.8%, adj HR=1.74, 95% CI: 1.34-2.25, p<0.001) at three years. A stratified analysis by stent type showed a higher risk of the primary outcome in SES with OL (28.7%) compared to other SES groups (without OL: 22.6%, p=0.04; single DES: 17.6%, p<0.001), but not between EES with OL (22.3%) and other EES groups (without OL: 18.5%, p=0.30; single DES: 20.4%, p=0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

DES overlap is associated with impaired clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up. Compared with SES, EES provide similar clinical outcomes irrespective of DES overlap status.

摘要

目的

早期一代药物洗脱支架(DES)重叠(OL)与长期临床结局受损有关,而新一代 DES 中 OL 的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估在接受新一代 DES 治疗的患者中,OL 对长期临床结局的影响。

方法和结果

我们根据支架类型(西罗莫司洗脱支架 [SES;n=1532] 与依维莫司洗脱支架 [EES;n=1601])和 OL 的存在与否,分析了前瞻性 DES 注册研究中 3133 例患者的三年临床结局。主要结局是死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和靶血管血运重建(TVR)的复合结局。主要终点在 OL 患者(25.1%)中比在无 OL 的多个 DES 患者(20.8%,调整 HR=1.46,95%CI:1.03-2.09)和单个 DES 患者(18.8%,调整 HR=1.74,95%CI:1.34-2.25,p<0.001)中更常见。按支架类型分层分析显示,OL 患者 SES 的主要结局风险较高(28.7%),与其他 SES 组相比(无 OL:22.6%,p=0.04;单 DES:17.6%,p<0.001),而 EES 与 OL 患者(22.3%)与其他 EES 组(无 OL:18.5%,p=0.30;单 DES:20.4%,p=0.20)之间无差异。

结论

DES 重叠与长期随访期间临床结局受损有关。与 SES 相比,EES 无论 DES 重叠状态如何,均可提供相似的临床结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验