• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴茎肱动脉指数与血管造影术的比较:海绵体动脉血流评估

A comparison of penile brachial index and angiography: evaluation of corpora cavernosa arterial inflow.

作者信息

Schwartz A N, Lowe M A, Ireton R, Berger R E, Richardson M L, Graney D O

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

J Urol. 1990 Mar;143(3):510-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40004-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40004-8
PMID:2406464
Abstract

We studied 32 impotent patients with angiography. The penile branchial index was calculated from the maximal penile arterial pressure measured from any penile artery. In 15 of the 32 patients an attempt was made to isolate the cavernous artery pressure (cavernous artery penile brachial index). There was a poor correlation between angiography and penile branchial index (r equals 0.314) and between angiography and cavernous penile brachial index (r equals 0.637). We also evaluated 15 normal individuals and a wide range of penile brachial index values was found (0.7 to 1.0). Penile brachial index values from normal patients overlapped with those from impotent patients. Penile brachial index values from impotent patients with normal and abnormal arteries (as determined by angiography) overlapped. The fact that penile brachial index measurements are performed in the flaccid state and without direct visualization of the cavernous arteries accounts for some of the variability of the penile brachial index test.

摘要

我们对32例阳痿患者进行了血管造影研究。阴茎臂指数是根据从任何阴茎动脉测得的最大阴茎动脉压计算得出的。在32例患者中的15例中,尝试测量海绵体动脉压(海绵体动脉阴茎臂指数)。血管造影与阴茎臂指数之间的相关性较差(r = 0.314),血管造影与海绵体阴茎臂指数之间的相关性也较差(r = 0.637)。我们还评估了15名正常个体,发现阴茎臂指数值范围较广(0.7至1.0)。正常患者的阴茎臂指数值与阳痿患者的阴茎臂指数值有重叠。血管造影显示动脉正常和异常的阳痿患者的阴茎臂指数值有重叠。阴茎臂指数测量是在阴茎疲软状态下进行的,且未直接观察海绵体动脉,这是阴茎臂指数测试存在一定变异性的部分原因。

相似文献

1
A comparison of penile brachial index and angiography: evaluation of corpora cavernosa arterial inflow.阴茎肱动脉指数与血管造影术的比较:海绵体动脉血流评估
J Urol. 1990 Mar;143(3):510-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40004-8.
2
Correlation between penile angiography and duplex scanning of cavernous arteries in impotent men.
J Urol. 1990 Jun;143(6):1128-30. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40203-5.
3
A normal penile pressure cannot rule out the presence of lesions on the arteries supplying the hypogastric circulation in patients with arterial claudication.
Vasc Med. 2009 Nov;14(4):331-8. doi: 10.1177/1358863X09106173.
4
The evaluation of arterial inflow by gravity cavernosometry.通过重力海绵体测压法评估动脉血流。
J Urol. 1997 Aug;158(2):440-3. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199708000-00029.
5
Cavernous arterial and arteriolar circulation in patients with erectile dysfunction: a power Doppler study.勃起功能障碍患者的海绵体动脉和小动脉循环:一项能量多普勒研究。
J Urol. 1998 Feb;159(2):428-32. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63941-7.
6
Comparison of selective internal iliac pharmaco-angiography, penile brachial index and duplex sonography with pulsed Doppler analysis for the evaluation of vasculogenic (arteriogenic) impotence.选择性髂内动脉药物血管造影、阴茎肱动脉指数及脉冲多普勒分析双功超声检查在评估血管源性(动脉源性)阳痿中的比较
J Urol. 1990 May;143(5):928-32. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40140-6.
7
Penile blood flow changes in the flaccid and erect state in potent young men measured by duplex scanning.通过双功扫描测量有勃起功能的年轻男性阴茎在疲软和勃起状态下的血流变化。
J Urol. 1990 Oct;144(4):894-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39617-9.
8
Penile blood pressure.阴茎血压
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1981;15(3):161-4. doi: 10.3109/00365598109179595.
9
Is the penile brachial index a reproducible and useful measurement?
Br J Urol. 1990 Aug;66(2):202-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14904.x.
10
Diagnostic tests for impotence: a comparison of papaverine injection with the penile-brachial index and nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring.
J Urol. 1986 May;135(5):923-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45924-6.