Suppr超能文献

轻度和中度儿科创伤性脑损伤:用神经检查代替常规重复头部计算机断层扫描。

Mild and moderate pediatric traumatic brain injury: replace routine repeat head computed tomography with neurologic examination.

机构信息

From the Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Oct;75(4):550-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a53a77.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opinion is divided on the role of routine repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) for guiding clinical management in pediatric patients with blunt head trauma. We hypothesize that routine RHCT does not lead to change in management in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

This is a 3-year retrospective study of all patients of age 2 years to 18 years with blunt TBI admitted to our Level 1 trauma center with an abnormal head CT. Indications for RHCT (routine vs. neurologic deterioration) and their findings (progression or improvement) were recorded. Neurosurgical intervention was defined as extraventricular drain placement, craniectomy, or craniotomy. Primary outcome was a change in management after RHCT.

RESULTS

A total of 291 pediatric patients were identified; of which 191 patients received an RHCT. Routine RHCT did not lead to neurosurgical intervention in the mild and moderate TBI group. In patients who received RHCT due to neurologic decline (n = 7), radiographic progression was seen on 85% of the patients (n = 6), with subsequent neurosurgical interventions in three patients. Two of these patients had a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of less than 8 at admission.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that the neurologic examination can be trusted and is reliable in pediatric blunt TBI patients in determining when an RHCT scan is necessary. We recommend that RHCT is required routinely in patients with intracranial hemorrhage with GCS score of 8 or less and in patients with GCS greater than 8 and that RHCT be performed only when there are clinical indications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic/therapeutic study, level IV.

摘要

背景

对于指导小儿闭合性颅脑外伤患者的临床管理,重复头部计算机断层扫描(RHCT)的常规应用是否具有作用,目前意见不一。我们假设在轻度和中度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中,常规 RHCT 不会改变治疗方法。

方法

这是一项对所有年龄在 2 岁至 18 岁、因闭合性 TBI 而入住我们的 1 级创伤中心且头部 CT 异常的患者进行的为期 3 年的回顾性研究。记录了 RHCT 的适应证(常规与神经恶化)及其结果(进展或改善)。神经外科干预定义为脑室引流、开颅减压或开颅术。主要结局是 RHCT 后治疗方法的改变。

结果

共确定了 291 例儿科患者;其中 191 例患者接受了 RHCT。在轻度和中度 TBI 组中,常规 RHCT 并未导致神经外科干预。在因神经功能下降而接受 RHCT 的 7 例患者中,85%(6 例)的患者出现了影像学进展,随后有 3 例患者进行了神经外科干预。其中 2 例患者入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分低于 8。

结论

我们的研究表明,在小儿闭合性 TBI 患者中,神经检查可用于确定何时需要进行 RHCT 扫描,并且这种检查是可靠的。我们建议,对于 GCS 评分低于 8 的颅内出血患者和 GCS 评分大于 8 的患者,需要常规进行 RHCT,只有在有临床指征时才进行 RHCT。

证据水平

诊断/治疗研究,IV 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验