Ding Hong, Zhang Zhi-Meng, Dai Liang-Xiang, Kang Tao, Ci Dun-Wei, Song Wen-Wu
Shandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Jun;24(6):1586-92.
Taking two peanut varieties Huayu 17 and Tangke 8 as test objects, a soil column culture experiment was conducted in a rainproof tank to study the peanut root morphological development and physiological characteristics at late growth stages under moderate drought and well-watered conditions. Tanke 8 had more developed root system and higher yield and drought coefficient, while Huayu 17 had poorer root adaptability to drought stress. For the two varieties, their root length density and root biomass were mainly distributed in 0-40 cm soil layer, whereas their root traits differed in the same soil layer. The total root length, total root surface area, and total root volume of Huayu 17 at each growth stage were smaller under drought stress than under well-balanced water treatment, while these root characteristics of Tangke 8 under drought stress only decreased at flowering-pegging stage. Drought stress increased the root biomass, surface area, and volume of the two varieties in 20-40 cm soil layer, but decreased these root traits in the soil layers below 40 cm. Under drought stress, the root activity of the two varieties in the soil layers below 40 cm at pod filling stage decreased, and the decrement was larger for Huayu 17. The differences in the root system development and physiological characteristics of the two varieties at late growth stages under drought stress suggested that the root system of the two varieties had different water absorption and utilization under drought stress.
以两个花生品种花育17号和唐科8号为试验对象,在防雨池中进行土柱栽培试验,研究适度干旱和水分充足条件下花生生育后期的根系形态发育和生理特性。唐科8号根系更发达,产量和抗旱系数更高,而花育17号对干旱胁迫的根系适应性较差。对于这两个品种,其根长密度和根生物量主要分布在0-40厘米土层,而在同一土层中它们的根系性状存在差异。干旱胁迫下,花育17号各生育期的总根长、总根表面积和总根体积均小于水分平衡处理,而唐科8号在干旱胁迫下仅在开花下针期这些根系特征有所下降。干旱胁迫增加了两个品种在20-40厘米土层的根生物量、表面积和体积,但降低了40厘米以下土层的这些根系性状。干旱胁迫下,两个品种在荚果充实期40厘米以下土层的根系活力下降,花育17号下降幅度更大。干旱胁迫下两个品种生育后期根系发育和生理特性的差异表明,干旱胁迫下两个品种的根系在水分吸收和利用方面存在差异。