• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的现状

Current state of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children.

作者信息

Chrestiana Dewi, Sucandy Iswanto

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2013 Sep;79(9):897-8.

PMID:24069987
Abstract

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has recently increased in number. A systematic review of English-language literature from 2009 to 2011 was performed to evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of SILS for various indications in children. Our study reports seven previously published studies of 218 cases. There were insignificant differences in operative time and length of hospital stay of SILS when compared to multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Despite SILS is a more challenging technique to perform, it is a safe and feasible alternative for cholecystectomy in children.

摘要

单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)近年来数量有所增加。我们对2009年至2011年的英文文献进行了系统回顾,以评估SILS在儿童各种适应症中的可行性和疗效。我们的研究报告了7项先前发表的涉及218例病例的研究。与多端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,SILS的手术时间和住院时间无显著差异。尽管SILS是一种更具挑战性的手术技术,但它是儿童胆囊切除术的一种安全可行的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Current state of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children.儿童单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的现状
Am Surg. 2013 Sep;79(9):897-8.
2
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)与传统多孔胆囊切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1205-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
3
Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.单切口腹腔镜、迷你腹腔镜、四孔腹腔镜、三孔腹腔镜和单切口机器人胆囊切除术的比较结果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2023 Jan;75(1):41-51. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01387-2. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does it work? A systematic review.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:可行吗?一项系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4389-99. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4757-5. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
5
Laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct.腹腔镜 - 内镜会师术与术前内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆囊和胆管结石行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 11;4(4):CD010507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010507.pub2.
6
Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review.机器人辅助胆囊切除术的术中及术后结果:一项系统评价
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 23;10(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01673-x.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery.单孔腹腔镜结肠手术的系统评价。
Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1353-64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8834.
9
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗单纯性胆绞痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30;2013(6):CD007196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007196.pub3.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):367-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1217-5. Epub 2010 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of outcomes after single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in relation to patient body mass index.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术结果与患者体重指数的比较。
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00048.