• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诺氟沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗复发性尿路感染的对比

Treatment of recurrent urinary tract infection with norfloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

作者信息

Seidmon E J, Krisch E B, Truant A L, Amy B G, Childs S J, Hurst A T, McCabe R E

机构信息

Department of Urology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Urology. 1990 Feb;35(2):187-93. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(90)80074-w.

DOI:10.1016/0090-4295(90)80074-w
PMID:2407023
Abstract

Norfloxacin, a broad-spectrum antimicrobial analog of nalidixic acid, was evaluated by comparing it to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in 93 office patients with recurrent urinary tract infections. In this prospective randomized study, norfloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were given on the same dosage schedule with the former drug given as a 400-mg tablet twice daily and the latter drug given as a double strength tablet twice daily. Overall, 50 patients received norfloxacin and 43 patients received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole with a cure rate of 96 percent and 79 percent, respectively. Whether a patient had one infection or multiple previous infections, norfloxacin appeared to be superior to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Only minor side effects were noted in either group, and no patient withdrew from this study as a direct result of these side effects. Minor complaints of nausea, dizziness, and headache were found in the norfloxacin group (24%) and in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group (16%). Both agents are effective in treating urinary tract infections but norfloxacin is superior to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in patients with either recurrent complicated infections or one previous uncomplicated urinary tract infection.

摘要

诺氟沙星是萘啶酸的一种广谱抗菌类似物,通过将其与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑对比,对93例复发性尿路感染的门诊患者进行了评估。在这项前瞻性随机研究中,诺氟沙星和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑采用相同的给药方案,前者给予400毫克片剂,每日两次,后者给予双倍剂量片剂,每日两次。总体而言,50例患者接受了诺氟沙星治疗,43例患者接受了甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗,治愈率分别为96%和79%。无论患者是单次感染还是既往有多次感染,诺氟沙星似乎都优于甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑。两组均仅出现轻微副作用,且没有患者因这些副作用而直接退出本研究。诺氟沙星组(24%)和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑组(16%)均出现了轻微的恶心、头晕和头痛主诉。两种药物都对治疗尿路感染有效,但在复发性复杂感染或既往有一次单纯性尿路感染的患者中,诺氟沙星优于甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑。

相似文献

1
Treatment of recurrent urinary tract infection with norfloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.诺氟沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗复发性尿路感染的对比
Urology. 1990 Feb;35(2):187-93. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(90)80074-w.
2
Coordinated multicenter study of norfloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment of symptomatic urinary tract infections. The Urinary Tract Infection Study Group.
J Infect Dis. 1987 Feb;155(2):170-7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/155.2.170.
3
Norfloxacin in the treatment of complicated and uncomplicated urinary tract infections. A comparative multicenter trial.
Am J Med. 1987 Jun 26;82(6B):65-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90621-8.
4
Norfloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of urinary tract infections.诺氟沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗尿路感染的比较。
Eur Urol. 1990;17 Suppl 1:34-9. doi: 10.1159/000464089.
5
A multicenter comparative trial of three-day norfloxacin vs ten-day sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections.一项关于三日诺氟沙星与十日复方磺胺甲恶唑治疗单纯性尿路感染的多中心对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 1987 Oct;147(10):1760-2.
6
[Effectiveness and tolerance of norfloxacin compared with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections].诺氟沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗单纯性尿路感染的有效性及耐受性比较
Rev Med Univ Navarra. 1988 Jul-Sep;32(3):135-7.
7
Norfloxacin versus co-trimoxazole for treatment of urinary tract infections in adults: microbiological results of a coordinated multicentre study.诺氟沙星与复方新诺明治疗成人尿路感染的比较:一项多中心协作研究的微生物学结果
Scand J Infect Dis. 1987;19(5):551-7. doi: 10.3109/00365548709032422.
8
Norfloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the therapy of uncomplicated, community-acquired urinary tract infections.诺氟沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗非复杂性社区获得性尿路感染的疗效比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Mar;27(3):422-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.27.3.422.
9
Effect of norfloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and nitrofurantoin on fecal flora of women with recurrent urinary tract infections.诺氟沙星、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑和呋喃妥因对复发性尿路感染女性粪便菌群的影响。
J Chemother. 1997 Jun;9(3):203-7. doi: 10.1179/joc.1997.9.3.203.
10
Cefixime versus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in treatment of patients with acute, uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections.头孢克肟与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗急性单纯性下尿路感染患者的疗效比较
Urology. 1989 Nov;34(5):322-6. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90335-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Congestive heart failure with sinus rhythm. Audit of digoxin therapy in a family medicine teaching unit.窦性心律的充血性心力衰竭。家庭医学教学单位地高辛治疗的审计。
Can Fam Physician. 1993 Dec;39:2541-5.
2
Inhalation devices for asthma. Choosing the right one could make all the difference.哮喘吸入装置。选择合适的装置可能会带来天壤之别。
Can Fam Physician. 1993 Nov;39:2377-82.