• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

索拉非尼和舒尼替尼治疗老年肾癌患者。

Sorafenib and sunitinib for elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France.

出版信息

J Geriatr Oncol. 2013 Jul;4(3):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jgo.2013.04.004
PMID:24070463
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib and sorafenib are small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors with known antitumor activity in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assess the response and tolerance of elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma to these two agents. Data of patients aged ≥70years receiving sorafenib or sunitinib at the Centre Léon Bérard were analyzed. Forty-eight patients received sorafenib or sunitinib as a first line treatment, 8 received sorafenib followed by sunitinib and 4 received the reverse sequence. Objective responses (ORs), stable disease (SD), toxicity, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were reported.

RESULTS

Sorafenib and sunitinib achieved similar OR+SD rates (79% vs. 71% respectively). Median PFS was 6months in first-line sorafenib treated patients and 5months in the sunitinib group. Median OS was 16months in first-line sorafenib-treated patients and 15months in the sunitinib group. In patients receiving sorafenib followed by sunitinib, median PFS was 11.5months, and median OS was 13.1months. With the reverse sequence, median PFS was 8.1months and median OS was 15months. Treatment modifications were more frequent in sunitinib-treated patients, in first or second line (75% vs. 50%). Limitations are the retrospective design of the study and the small number of patients.

CONCLUSION

First-line sunitinib and sorafenib seem equally efficient in elderly patients treated for advanced renal carcinomas, but sunitinib is less well tolerated. Sequential treatment with sorafenib followed by sunitinib seems to be better tolerated. These results should be confirmed in a larger prospective study.

摘要

背景

舒尼替尼和索拉非尼是小分子酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,在晚期肾细胞癌中具有已知的抗肿瘤活性。

材料和方法

我们回顾性评估了这两种药物在老年肾细胞癌患者中的疗效和耐受性。分析了在里昂·贝拉德中心接受索拉非尼或舒尼替尼治疗的年龄≥70 岁的患者的数据。48 例患者接受索拉非尼或舒尼替尼一线治疗,8 例患者接受索拉非尼序贯舒尼替尼治疗,4 例患者接受舒尼替尼序贯索拉非尼治疗。报告了客观缓解率(OR)、疾病稳定(SD)、毒性、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

索拉非尼和舒尼替尼的 OR+SD 率相似(分别为 79%和 71%)。一线索拉非尼治疗患者的中位 PFS 为 6 个月,舒尼替尼组为 5 个月。一线索拉非尼治疗患者的中位 OS 为 16 个月,舒尼替尼组为 15 个月。接受索拉非尼序贯舒尼替尼治疗的患者中位 PFS 为 11.5 个月,中位 OS 为 13.1 个月。采用反向序贯治疗,中位 PFS 为 8.1 个月,中位 OS 为 15 个月。舒尼替尼组患者治疗方案调整更频繁,一线或二线治疗中分别为 75%和 50%。研究的局限性在于回顾性设计和患者数量少。

结论

在治疗晚期肾细胞癌的老年患者中,一线舒尼替尼和索拉非尼的疗效似乎相当,但舒尼替尼的耐受性较差。索拉非尼序贯舒尼替尼治疗似乎更能耐受。这些结果需要在更大的前瞻性研究中得到证实。

相似文献

1
Sorafenib and sunitinib for elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma.索拉非尼和舒尼替尼治疗老年肾癌患者。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2013 Jul;4(3):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 9.
2
[Comparison of efficacy between sorafenib and sunitinib as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and analyze prognostic factors for survival].索拉非尼与舒尼替尼作为转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗的疗效比较及生存预后因素分析
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018 May 23;40(5):384-389. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.05.012.
3
Comparative efficacy of sunitinib versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.舒尼替尼对比索拉非尼作为转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗的疗效比较。
Chemotherapy. 2012;58(6):468-74. doi: 10.1159/000346484. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
4
Sorafenib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment agents in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the largest multicenter retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors.索拉非尼与舒尼替尼作为中国转移性肾细胞癌患者一线治疗药物的疗效比较:最大规模的多中心生存及预后因素回顾性分析
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-3016-4.
5
Efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: largest single-center retrospective analysis.索拉非尼与舒尼替尼作为转移性肾细胞癌患者一线治疗的疗效和安全性:最大规模单中心回顾性分析
Oncotarget. 2016 May 10;7(19):27044-54. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7395.
6
Sunitinib treatment for patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma after progression on sorafenib.舒尼替尼用于索拉非尼治疗进展后的晚期透明细胞肾细胞癌患者。
Oncology. 2009;76(5):350-4. doi: 10.1159/000209961. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
7
SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.SWITCH 研究:比较索拉非尼-舒尼替尼与舒尼替尼-索拉非尼序贯治疗转移性肾细胞癌的随机、开放标签、连续研究
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):837-47. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 May 4.
8
Third-line sorafenib after sequential therapy with sunitinib and mTOR inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.多线索拉非尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌舒尼替尼和 mTOR 抑制剂序贯治疗后
Eur Urol. 2010 Dec;58(6):906-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
9
Sorafenib or sunitinib as postoperative adjuvant therapy for Chinese patients with locally advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma at high risk for disease recurrence.索拉非尼或舒尼替尼作为术后辅助治疗用于有疾病复发高风险的中国局部进展期透明细胞肾细胞癌患者。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Nov;31(8):1800-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.04.019. Epub 2012 May 31.
10
Frequent dose interruptions are required for patients receiving oral kinase inhibitor therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma.对于接受口服激酶抑制剂治疗晚期肾细胞癌的患者,需要频繁中断剂量。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;33(3):217-20. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181a650a6.

引用本文的文献

1
Sorafenib exhibits lower toxicity and comparable efficacy to sunitinib as a first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.索拉非尼作为转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗药物,其毒性低于舒尼替尼,疗效相当:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 8;102(36):e34983. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034983.
2
Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Costs of Sorafenib vs. Sunitinib as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.索拉非尼与舒尼替尼作为转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗的疗效、安全性及成本比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2019 Jun 21;9:479. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00479. eCollection 2019.
3
Efficacy and safety of axitinib in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
阿昔替尼在老年转移性肾细胞癌患者中的疗效与安全性。
Med Oncol. 2016 Aug;33(8):95. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0813-1. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
4
Expert Recommendations for First-Line Management of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Special Subpopulations.特殊亚群转移性肾细胞癌一线管理的专家建议
Target Oncol. 2016 Apr;11(2):129-41. doi: 10.1007/s11523-015-0408-3.