Suppr超能文献

共同决策:利用健康信息技术将患者选择纳入初级保健。

Shared decision making: using health information technology to integrate patient choice into primary care.

机构信息

Center for Health Research, Geisinger Clinic, Danville, PA USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2011 Mar;1(1):123-33. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0023-5.

Abstract

Advances in shared decision making (SDM) have not successfully translated to practice. We describe our experience and lessons learned in translating an SDM process for primary care cardiovascular disease management. The SDM process operationalized recognized SDM elements using workflow modifications, a computerized patient questionnaire, an automated risk calculator to identify at-risk patients, a web-based tool for patients to choose interventions, automated feedback on the personalized benefits of choices, and a web-based tool for providers to view patient risk, patient choice, and expert advice. Although medication was typically the intervention resulting in the greatest risk reduction, the majority of patients preferred dietary and other lifestyle changes. Patients generally favored the opportunity to make and communicate choices. However, providers only viewed patient choice data in 20% of the encounters. Translation of the SDM process was successful for patients and the difference between patient choice and optimal risk reduction points to the importance of engaging in an SDM process. Lack of engagement by providers may be due to "alert fatigue" or to the failure of the SDM process to improve efficiency in the office visit.

摘要

共享决策(SDM)的进展并未成功转化为实践。我们描述了我们在将 SDM 流程转化为初级保健心血管疾病管理方面的经验和教训。该 SDM 流程使用工作流程修改、计算机化患者问卷、自动风险计算器来识别高危患者、用于患者选择干预措施的基于网络的工具、对选择的个性化益处的自动反馈以及用于查看患者风险、患者选择和专家建议的基于网络的工具来实现公认的 SDM 要素。尽管药物治疗通常是导致最大风险降低的干预措施,但大多数患者更喜欢饮食和其他生活方式的改变。患者通常赞成有机会做出和沟通选择。然而,在 20%的就诊中,医生只查看了患者选择数据。SDM 流程的转换对患者来说是成功的,患者选择与最佳风险降低之间的差异表明了进行 SDM 流程的重要性。提供者缺乏参与可能是由于“警报疲劳”或 SDM 流程未能提高就诊效率所致。

相似文献

1
Shared decision making: using health information technology to integrate patient choice into primary care.
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Mar;1(1):123-33. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0023-5.
2
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
3
Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review.
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;19(8):959-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01414.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
4
6
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
7
Patients' and physicians' gender and perspective on shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study from Dubai.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0270700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270700. eCollection 2022.
9
10
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Practical applications of methods to incorporate patient preferences into medical decision models: a scoping review.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02945-5.
5
Electronic Health Record Technology Designed for the Clinical Encounter: MS NeuroShare.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;11(4):318-326. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000986.
6
An Informatics Approach to Implement Support for Shared Decision Making for Primary Prevention Statin Therapy.
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 May 22;3(1):2381468318777752. doi: 10.1177/2381468318777752. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.
7
Patients' Use and Perception of Internet-Based Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Resources.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Sep 20;6(9):2325967118796469. doi: 10.1177/2325967118796469. eCollection 2018 Sep.
9
Computerized Decision Aids for Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness: Systematic Review.
JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Oct 6;5(4):e36. doi: 10.2196/medinform.6405.

本文引用的文献

2
Self-rated cardiovascular risk and 15-year cardiovascular mortality.
Ann Fam Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;6(4):302-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.859.
3
Issues in the design of Internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes.
Qual Life Res. 2007 Oct;16(8):1407-17. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9235-z. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
4
Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):716-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716.
6
Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):138-47. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1809. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
7
An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters.
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):301-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
8
Shared medical decision making: problems, process, progress.
JAMA. 2004 Nov 24;292(20):2516-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.20.2516.
10
Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):523-30. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1370. Epub 2003 Aug 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验