• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展以患者为中心的医疗之家:对“患者对共同决策的偏好:系统评价”的概要和评论。

Developing a patient-centered medical home: synopsis and comment on "Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review".

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2012 Sep;2(3):260-1. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0154-3.

DOI:10.1007/s13142-012-0154-3
PMID:24073121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3717902/
Abstract

The seventh column on Evidence-Based Behavioral Medicine synopsizes a systematic review by Chewning and colleagues (Pat Educ Couns 86:9-18, 2012) on patient preferences for shared decision-making regarding treatment and screening. A total of 115 studies were included in the final analyses. In 63 % of studies, a majority of patients preferred sharing decisions with their primary care physician, as opposed to delegating health decisions to their provider. A time trend appeared such that in studies published more recently, a greater percentage of patients, particularly cancer patients, preferred sharing decisions. Further research should seek to better understand how the decision making of specific patient populations is influenced by life course changes and secular trends. Longitudinal studies can help to elucidate how patient decision-making preferences evolve over the course of illness and health status changes in different medical conditions.

摘要

循证行为医学第七栏概述了 Chewning 及其同事(Pat Educ Couns 86:9-18, 2012)关于患者对治疗和筛查方面共同决策的偏好的系统评价。最终分析共纳入了 115 项研究。在 63%的研究中,大多数患者更愿意与他们的初级保健医生共同决策,而不是将健康决策委托给提供者。出现了一个时间趋势,即在最近发表的研究中,更多的患者,特别是癌症患者,更喜欢共同决策。进一步的研究应该旨在更好地了解特定患者群体的决策是如何受到生命历程变化和长期趋势的影响的。纵向研究可以帮助阐明在不同的医疗条件下,患者的决策偏好如何随着疾病和健康状况的变化而演变。

相似文献

1
Developing a patient-centered medical home: synopsis and comment on "Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review".发展以患者为中心的医疗之家:对“患者对共同决策的偏好:系统评价”的概要和评论。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Sep;2(3):260-1. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0154-3.
2
Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.患者对共同决策的偏好:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
3
Decision-making role preferences among patients with HIV: associations with patient and provider characteristics and communication behaviors.HIV患者的决策角色偏好:与患者及医疗服务提供者特征和沟通行为的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun;25(6):517-23. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1275-3. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
4
Factors associated with shared decision-making preferences among veterans with serious mental illness.患有严重精神疾病的退伍军人中与共同决策偏好相关的因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Dec 1;65(12):1409-13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400131. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
5
Direct-Observation Cohort Study of Shared Decision Making in a Primary Care Clinic.直接观察式队列研究:在基层医疗诊所中进行的共享决策制定
Med Decis Making. 2020 Aug;40(6):756-765. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20936272. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust?为什么有些患者更愿意将决策交给医生:是缺乏自我效能感还是信任问题?
J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Dec;7(4):592-601. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0298-2. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
7
Examining Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision Making and Subsequent Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.审视旨在支持姑息治疗中共同决策及后续患者结局的干预措施:文献系统综述
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Jan;36(1):76-88. doi: 10.1177/1049909118783688. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
8
Patients With Limited Health Literacy Have Similar Preferences but Different Perceptions in Surgical Decision-making for Carpal Tunnel Release.健康素养有限的患者在腕管松解术的手术决策中具有相似的偏好,但感知不同。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Apr;476(4):846-851. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000075.
9
Patient autonomy in dentistry: demonstrating the role for shared decision making.牙科中的患者自主权:展示共同决策的作用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01317-5.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptualizing success factors for patient engagement in patient medical homes: a cross-sectional survey.构建患者参与医疗之家的成功因素概念:一项横断面调查。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Dec 14;9(4):E1159-E1167. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200152. Print 2021 Oct-Dec.
2
The Politics of Primary Care Expansion: Lessons From Cancer Survivorship and Substance Abuse.基层医疗扩张的政治:癌症生存者和药物滥用的经验教训。
J Healthc Manag. 2018 Sep-Oct;63(5):323-336. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-16-00030.
3
The Patient-Centered Medical Home as a Community-based Strategy.以患者为中心的医疗之家作为一种基于社区的策略。
Perm J. 2017;21:17-002. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-002.
4
Can team-based care improve patient satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.基于团队的护理能否提高患者满意度?一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 11;9(7):e100603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100603. eCollection 2014.
5
Behavioral health coaching for rural veterans with diabetes and depression: a patient randomized effectiveness implementation trial.针对患有糖尿病和抑郁症的农村退伍军人的行为健康指导:一项患者随机有效性实施试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 28;14:191. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-191.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.患者对共同决策的偏好:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
2
Health decision making: lynchpin of evidence-based practice.健康决策:循证实践的关键
Med Decis Making. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):866-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08326146. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
3
Evidence-based practice in clinical psychology: what it is, why it matters; what you need to know.临床心理学中的循证实践:它是什么,为何重要;你需要了解什么。
J Clin Psychol. 2007 Jul;63(7):611-31. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20373.
4
Developing ethical strategies to assist oncologists in seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials.制定伦理策略,以协助肿瘤学家在癌症临床试验中寻求知情同意。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(2):379-90. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00204-1.