• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Exploring dispositional tendencies to seek online information about direct-to-consumer genetic testing.探索个体寻求直接面向消费者的基因检测在线信息的倾向性。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):392-400. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0159-y.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.定义识别成人和儿童乳糜泻的最佳策略:系统评价和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(44):1-310. doi: 10.3310/ZUCE8371.
4
Consumers' use of web-based information and their decisions about multiplex genetic susceptibility testing.消费者对基于网络信息的使用及其关于多重基因易感性检测的决策。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Sep 29;12(3):e41. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1587.
5
Patient experiences with clinical confirmatory genetic testing after using direct-to-consumer raw DNA and third-party genetic interpretation services.患者在使用直接面向消费者的原始DNA和第三方基因解读服务后进行临床验证性基因检测的经历。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Feb 28;13(2):104-114. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac083.
6
Personal Genetic Information about HIV: Research Participants' Views of Ethical, Social, and Behavioral Implications.关于艾滋病病毒的个人基因信息:研究参与者对伦理、社会和行为影响的看法。
Public Health Genomics. 2019;22(1-2):36-45. doi: 10.1159/000501672. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
7
Proxy Information Seeking by Users of a Parenting Information Website: Quantitative Observational Study.育儿信息网站用户的代理信息搜索:定量观察性研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Mar 4;5(1):e32406. doi: 10.2196/32406.
8
The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study.在线健康信息搜索者的特征与动机:横断面调查与定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Feb 23;13(1):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1600.
9
Genetic counseling following direct-to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives.直接面向消费者的基因检测后的遗传咨询:消费者的观点。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Feb;30(1):329-334. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1309. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
10
How interested is the public in genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility? Report of a cross-sectional population survey.公众对结肠癌易感性基因检测的兴趣如何?一项横断面人群调查的报告。
Cancer Prev Control. 1998 Aug;2(4):167-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.基于互联网的直接面向消费者的基因检测:一项系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 14;17(12):e279. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4378.

本文引用的文献

1
Consumers' views of direct-to-consumer genetic information.消费者对直接面向消费者的基因信息的看法。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2010;11:427-46. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141604.
2
PRISM: a planned risk information seeking model.PRISM:一种计划性风险信息寻求模型。
Health Commun. 2010 Jun;25(4):345-56. doi: 10.1080/10410231003775172.
3
Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.参与基因检测研究的情况因社会群体而异。
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(2):85-93. doi: 10.1159/000294277. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
4
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?直接面向消费者的基因检测:好、坏还是无害?
Clin Genet. 2010 Feb;77(2):101-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01291.x. Epub 2009 Nov 21.
5
Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.在线个性化基因组风险评估用户的特征:对医患互动的影响。
Genet Med. 2009 Aug;11(8):582-7. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b22c3a.
6
Effortful control, explicit processing, and the regulation of human evolved predispositions.努力控制、显性加工与人类进化倾向的调节
Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):1012-31. doi: 10.1037/a0013327.
7
The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.面向消费者的直接基因检测的现状:法律、伦理及政策问题。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008;9:161-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164319.
8
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.用于评估和比较多重中介模型中间接效应的渐近和重抽样策略。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879.
9
Putting science over supposition in the arena of personalized genomics.在个性化基因组学领域,将科学置于臆测之上。
Nat Genet. 2008 Aug;40(8):939-42. doi: 10.1038/ng0808-939.
10
A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.一项关于基因检测的感知风险、心理及行为影响的系统评价
Genet Med. 2008 Jan;10(1):19-32. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f524f.

探索个体寻求直接面向消费者的基因检测在线信息的倾向性。

Exploring dispositional tendencies to seek online information about direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

机构信息

Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 31, Room B1B54, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA ; Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):392-400. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0159-y.

DOI:10.1007/s13142-012-0159-y
PMID:24073142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3717920/
Abstract

Varying perspectives exist regarding the implications of genetic susceptibility testing for common disease, with some anticipating adverse effects and others expecting positive outcomes; however, little is known about the characteristics of people who are most likely to be interested in direct-to-consumer genetic testing. To that end, this study examines the association of individual dispositional differences with health risk perceptions and online information seeking related to a free genetic susceptibility test. Healthy adults enrolled in a large health maintenance organization were surveyed by telephone. Eligible participants (N = 1,959) were given access to a secure website that provided risk and benefit information about a genetic susceptibility test and given the option to be tested. Neuroticism was associated with increased perceptions of disease risk but not with logging on. Those scoring high in conscientiousness were more likely to log on. We found no evidence that neuroticism, a dispositional characteristic commonly linked to adverse emotional response, was predictive of online genetic information seeking in this sample of healthy adults.

摘要

关于遗传易感性检测对常见疾病的影响存在不同的观点,一些人预计会有不利影响,而另一些人则期望有积极的结果;然而,对于最有可能对直接面向消费者的基因检测感兴趣的人的特征,我们知之甚少。为此,本研究考察了个体特质差异与健康风险感知的关系,以及与免费遗传易感性检测相关的在线信息搜索。通过电话对参加大型健康维护组织的健康成年人进行了调查。符合条件的参与者(N=1959)被允许访问一个安全的网站,该网站提供了遗传易感性检测的风险和收益信息,并提供了检测的选项。神经质与疾病风险感知的增加有关,但与登录无关。那些责任心得分高的人更有可能登录。我们没有发现神经质(一种与不良情绪反应常有关联的性格特征)在这个健康成年人样本中是在线遗传信息搜索的预测因素。