Green Jennifer S, Teachman Bethany A
University of Virginia, Department of Psychology, 102 Gilmer Hall, PO Box 400400, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400.
J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2013 Jan 1;2(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2012.09.002.
We examined the predictive validity of explicit and implicit measures of threat overestimation in relation to contamination-fear outcomes using structural equation modeling. Undergraduate students high in contamination fear ( = 56) completed explicit measures of contamination threat likelihood and severity, as well as looming vulnerability cognitions, in addition to an implicit measure of danger associations with potential contaminants. Participants also completed measures of contamination-fear symptoms, as well as subjective distress and avoidance during a behavioral avoidance task, and state looming vulnerability cognitions during an exposure task. The latent explicit (but not implicit) threat overestimation variable was a significant and unique predictor of contamination fear symptoms and self-reported affective and cognitive facets of contamination fear. On the contrary, the implicit (but not explicit) latent measure predicted behavioral avoidance (at the level of a trend). Results are discussed in terms of differential predictive validity of implicit versus explicit markers of threat processing and multiple fear response systems.
我们使用结构方程模型检验了威胁高估的显性和隐性测量指标与污染恐惧结果相关的预测效度。污染恐惧程度高的本科生(n = 56)完成了污染威胁可能性和严重程度的显性测量指标,以及迫近的易感性认知,此外还完成了与潜在污染物的危险关联的隐性测量指标。参与者还完成了污染恐惧症状的测量指标,以及在行为回避任务中的主观痛苦和回避情况,以及在暴露任务中的状态迫近易感性认知。潜在的显性(而非隐性)威胁高估变量是污染恐惧症状以及污染恐惧的自我报告情感和认知方面的显著且独特的预测指标。相反,隐性(而非显性)潜在测量指标预测了行为回避(处于趋势水平)。我们从威胁处理的隐性与显性指标的差异预测效度以及多种恐惧反应系统的角度对结果进行了讨论。