• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续血流左心室辅助装置中的血压控制:疗效及其对不良事件的影响。

Blood pressure control in continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: efficacy and impact on adverse events.

机构信息

Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Artificial Heart Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.069. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.069
PMID:24075484
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous flow (CF) left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are afterload sensitive and therefore pump performance is affected by hypertension. In addition, poorly controlled hypertension may increase the risk of aortic insufficiency (AI) and stroke. Blood pressure regimens after CF LVAD have not been studied and their impact on rates of AI and stroke are unknown.

METHODS

Patients who had CF LVAD at a single center and were supported greater than 30 days were included. Blood pressure was monitored at home by Doppler. Outpatient management of blood pressure was conducted according to a predefined institutional protocol (target mean arterial pressure ≤ 80 mm Hg).

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were included. At the end of follow-up, 25 patients were not on an antihypertensive drug, of these 9 died. Of the 74% receiving antihypertensives, 54% required 1 medication, 34% were on 2, 10% were on 3, and 3% were on 4 or more. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (85% of patients on an antihypertensive) and beta blockers (30%) were the most commonly prescribed medications. There was a significantly higher neurologic event rate in those on no antihypertensives compared with those on antihypertensives (p = 0.009). Only 3% of patients with no or mild AI at baseline progressed to develop moderate or greater AI after a mean of 201 days of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood pressure control can be achieved in patients with CF LVADs, with the majority of patients requiring only 1 or 2 antihypertensives.

摘要

背景

连续流(CF)左心室辅助装置(LVAD)是后负荷敏感的,因此泵的性能受高血压的影响。此外,高血压控制不佳可能会增加主动脉瓣关闭不全(AI)和中风的风险。CF LVAD 后的血压方案尚未得到研究,其对 AI 和中风发生率的影响尚不清楚。

方法

本研究纳入了在单中心接受 CF LVAD 并支持时间大于 30 天的患者。在家中通过多普勒监测血压。根据预先设定的机构方案(目标平均动脉压≤80mmHg)对门诊血压进行管理。

结果

共纳入 96 例患者。在随访结束时,25 例患者未服用降压药,其中 9 例死亡。在接受降压治疗的 74%的患者中,54%需要服用 1 种药物,34%需要服用 2 种,10%需要服用 3 种,3%需要服用 4 种或更多种。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(接受降压治疗患者的 85%)和β受体阻滞剂(30%)是最常用的药物。与服用降压药的患者相比,未服用降压药的患者神经事件发生率明显更高(p=0.009)。在平均随访 201 天后,仅有 3%的基线时无或轻度 AI 的患者进展为中重度 AI。

结论

CF LVAD 患者的血压控制可以实现,大多数患者仅需服用 1 种或 2 种降压药。

相似文献

1
Blood pressure control in continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: efficacy and impact on adverse events.连续血流左心室辅助装置中的血压控制:疗效及其对不良事件的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.069. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
2
Blood pressure and adverse events during continuous flow left ventricular assist device support.持续血流左心室辅助装置支持期间的血压及不良事件
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 May;8(3):551-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.002000. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
3
Surgical correction of aortic valve insufficiency after left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后主动脉瓣关闭不全的手术矫正。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
4
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
5
Outcomes after implantation of partial-support left ventricular assist devices in inotropic-dependent patients: Do we still need full-support assist devices?在依赖血管活性药物的患者中植入部分支持左心室辅助装置后的结果:我们仍然需要全支持辅助装置吗?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Sep;148(3):1115-21; discussion 1021-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.063. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
6
Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow blood pumps on reducing pulmonary artery pressure in patients with fixed pulmonary hypertension.比较连续流和搏动流血泵对固定肺动脉高压患者肺动脉压的降低作用。
Artif Organs. 2013 Sep;37(9):763-7. doi: 10.1111/aor.12164. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
7
Changes in renal function after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.植入左心室辅助装置后肾功能的变化。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 3;59(1):26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.038.
8
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy in patients with preoperative hepatic failure: are we pushing the limits too far?术前肝功能衰竭患者的连续流左心室辅助装置治疗:我们是否走得太远了?
Artif Organs. 2015 Apr;39(4):336-42. doi: 10.1111/aor.12375. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Efficacy and durability of central oversewing for treatment of aortic insufficiency in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.中心缝合法治疗连续血流左心室辅助装置患者主动脉瓣关闭不全的疗效和耐久性
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Sep;33(9):937-42. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.04.017. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
Impact of concurrent surgical valve procedures in patients receiving continuous-flow devices.同期心脏瓣膜手术对接受持续性血流装置治疗患者的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):581-9; discussion 589. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.024.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling blood flow in the circle of Willis in continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: possible relevance to strokes.连续血流左心室辅助装置中 Willis 环血流建模:与中风的可能关联
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Feb;41(2):148-155. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01806-6. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
2
Expert consensus on blood pressure management in critically ill patients.危重症患者血压管理专家共识
J Intensive Med. 2023 Jul 14;3(3):185-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.06.001. eCollection 2023 Jul 31.
3
Neurologic Complications in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.
左心室辅助装置患者的神经系统并发症。
Can J Cardiol. 2023 Feb;39(2):210-221. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
4
Implantable hemodynamic monitoring and management of left ventricular assist devices: Optimal or optional?植入式血流动力学监测与左心室辅助装置的管理:是最佳选择还是可选项?
JTCVS Open. 2021 Sep 24;8:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.026. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Validity and success rate of noninvasive mean arterial blood pressure measurements in cf-LVAD patients: A technical review.cf-LVAD 患者无创平均动脉血压测量的有效性和成功率:技术综述。
Artif Organs. 2022 Dec;46(12):2361-2370. doi: 10.1111/aor.14367. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
6
Contemporary Drug Treatment of Advanced Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.当代射血分数降低型心力衰竭的药物治疗。
Drugs. 2022 Mar;82(4):375-405. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01666-z. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
7
Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology position paper on the management of left ventricular assist device-supported patients for the non-left ventricular assist device specialist healthcare provider: Part 2: at the emergency department.欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会关于非左心室辅助装置专科医疗保健提供者管理左心室辅助装置支持患者的立场文件:第 2 部分:在急诊科。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;8(6):4409-4424. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13587. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
8
[Recommendations for emergency management of patients with permanent mechanical circulatory support : Consensus statement of DGTHG, DIVI, DGIIN, DGAI, DGINA, DGfK and DGK].[永久性机械循环支持患者的急诊管理建议:德国心脏与胸外科学会(DGTHG)、德国重症与急救医学学会(DIVI)、德国重症监护与感染学会(DGIIN)、德国麻醉学与重症医学学会(DGAI)、德国心脏移植与心肺外科医师协会(DGINA)、德国心脏学会(DGfK)和德国心脏病学会(DGK)的共识声明]
Anaesthesist. 2020 Apr;69(4):238-253. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00750-5.
9
Mechanical circulatory support in children: past, present and future.儿童机械循环支持:过去、现在与未来。
Transl Pediatr. 2019 Oct;8(4):269-277. doi: 10.21037/tp.2019.07.14.
10
2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support.2019 年 EACTS 专家共识:长期机械循环支持
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Aug 1;56(2):230-270. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz098.